Today's Live Streams And Breaking Sports News!

 

View the content of this inline frame with your browser

Sports USA Radio

The Matt Walsh Show on US Sports Radio - Here's The INSANE Reality Of These Teen Takeovers That The Media Is Hiding From You

 

The "Teen Takeovers" occurring in our cities are not what the media portrays them to be. Here's what you need to know. Now streaming on US Sports Radio.

Click here to join the member-exclusive portion of my show.

Presented on US Sports by: Hat Club

Custom Exclusive NFL Caps
Custom NBA Cap Collection
Hat Club MLB Cap Collection

Fearless With Jason Whitlock on US Sports Radio - Jason Whitlock Goes CRAZY on Caitlin Clark, Shai Gilgeous Alexander & Cari Champion

 

Jason is dazed and confused. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander registered one of his worst postseason performances as the Oklahoma City Thunder fell to San Antonio in Game 6 of the Western Conference Finals. Moments later, Caitlin Clark followed suit as the Indiana Fever lost at Golden State. Why are marquee players stumbling in big moments? Both the two-time NBA MVP and the face of the WNBA lack the moxie in key situations. Is it effort? Or mental? Maybe lacking the competitive fortitude? Jay Skapinac and Dre Baldwin join Jason to expound on SGA and how Jalen Brunson took the Tom Brady route, assisting the New York Knicks in building a championship-caliber roster. Next up: Around the WNBA with Maurice Drake Jr. and Jon the Liquidator. Missouri Senator Eric Schmitt (R) comes aboard to provide insight into legislation billed as the last best chance to save college sports. Now streaming on US Sports Radio.

Presented on US Sports by: Hanes

Select Bras, Underwear & Socks Buy 2, Get 20% off

D.C. Divas Football @ US Sports Net - Cincinnati Cougars vs. D.C. Divas Presented by Strength On The Gridiron

 

Strength on the Gridiron Summit

Join us for an exclusive deep dive into cutting-edge football performance training at the Strength on the Gridiron Summit. This virtual event features industry-leading experts sharing their insights on strength, conditioning, injury prevention, and performance optimization—tailored specifically for football players and teams. Learn more.......

The Rock Almighty Friday Wake - Up Call: Controversies and Consequences: The Impact of Sharia Law on Human Rights with Nigeria as a case study.

 -Olonade Joshua

“Where, after all, do universal human rights begin? In small places, close to home — so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any maps of the world. Yet they are the world of the individual person; the neighborhood they live in; the school or college they attend; the factory, farm, or office where they work.” — Eleanor Roosevelt

In the year 2002, a dark shadow of injustice descended upon the life of Amina. She was accused of committing adultery, a grave offense under the stringent interpretation of Sharia law in Katsina State, Nigeria. Amina, a single mother, found herself ensnared within the unforgiving grip of the Sharia court. Despite her fervent protests of innocence and the unique circumstances of her being a divorcee, the court’s verdict was chillingly clear and unyielding — she was to face death by stoning. Amina’s case became an international focal point, exposing the severe and irreversible nature of the sentences imposed by Sharia law. Human rights organizations, women’s rights advocates, and governments worldwide voiced profound concern and outrage. At the forefront was the fundamental issue of the right to a fair trial, exemplified by Amina’s case. It cast serious doubts on the fairness of the proceedings and adherence to international standards of justice. Many believed that the evidence against her was insufficient, and her legal representation was egregiously inadequate. Amina’s ordeal underscored the glaring gender disparity that permeated the strict implementation of Sharia law. Amina’s case exemplified this unequal treatment, further igniting international condemnation. The global community rallied behind Amina’s cause, launching protests, advocacy campaigns, and diplomatic efforts to implore Nigerian authorities to reconsider her case. In September 2003, an Islamic appeals court overturned Amina Lawal’s conviction, and she was acquitted of the charges. Her journey through the labyrinthine complexities of Sharia law within the Nigerian legal system serves as a haunting reminder of the profound challenges and concerns it poses to human rights, particularly women’s rights. Her ordeal glaringly emphasized the critical need to safeguard human rights against oppressive interpretations of the law. In the intricate mosaic of global legal systems, the incorporation of religious laws within a nation’s legal framework often ignites fervent debates and soul-searching. Such is the case with the accommodation of Sharia law in the Nigerian legal system, a matter that strikes at the very heart of the nation’s constitutional foundations.

As the sun casts its vibrant hues over Nigeria’s diverse landscape, the clash between tradition and modernity, religion and secularism, reaches a crescendo. In this realm of conflicting perspectives, we embark on a journey to explore the heated discourse surrounding the constitutionality or lack thereof in incorporating Sharia law into the Nigerian legal framework. Also in the year 2014, the world was gripped by the harrowing ordeal of Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman whose plight brought into sharp focus the tragic implications of the application of Sharia law in certain countries. Meriam’s story stands as a poignant example of individuals who have seen their fundamental rights violated as a result of the strict implementation of Sharia law. Meriam Ibrahim entered this world as the daughter of a Christian mother and a Muslim father in Sudan. Raised under the Christian faith by her mother, Meriam embraced Christianity as her way of life. However, Sudan’s legal framework, deeply intertwined with Sharia law, deemed it unlawful for a Muslim woman to marry a non-Muslim man. Offspring born to such unions were automatically categorized as Muslims. Meriam, driven by love, married a Christian man, openly professing her Christian faith with unwavering devotion. The year 2014 brought her a calamity she could not have foreseen — she was accused of apostasy, the act of renouncing one’s faith, and subsequently charged under Sudan’s interpretation of Sharia law. The shockwaves of her arrest and the subsequent trial reverberated across the globe. Meriam, at the time heavily pregnant, faced the unimaginable ordeal of giving birth while in prison and in shackles. Her conviction was horrifyingly severe — she was sentenced to flogging for adultery and, devastatingly, to death for apostasy. The Sudanese legal system considered her a Muslim due to her father’s faith, rendering her marriage to a Christian man as an act of adultery. The international community responded with widespread condemnation and outcry. Human rights organizations, governments, and impassioned activists from every corner of the world united in demanding her immediate release and an end to the discriminatory application of Sharia law. In the midst of international pressure, Meriam’s case navigated a convoluted legal path, ultimately resulting in the overturning of her conviction. She was granted her freedom, but the scars of her agonizing experience ran deep. Meriam Ibrahim’s tragic narrative serves as an indelible reminder of the grave human rights transgressions that can occur when Sharia law is zealously enforced, particularly in cases involving interfaith marriages and personal religious choices. Culture and religion are deeply interwoven, with the moral fabric of a society deeply rooted in the spiritual beliefs that shape its conscience. Throughout pre and post-colonial times, culture and religion have been vital components of Nigeria and its people’s identity. From the 18th century, when Uthman Dan Fodio embarked on his Islamic crusades, introducing the Muslim faith to the people of northern Nigeria, it became the official religion of the region. Over centuries, the moral judgments and rules that shaped their conscience were deeply intertwined with Islamic culture, rendering it inseparable from the northern (Hausa, Fulani, etc.) culture. Even during the colonial era, despite the imposition of Western culture, customary laws persisted as they couldn’t be completely eradicated. Thus, the implementation of customary laws coexisted alongside constitutional law and common law. Sharia law, also known as Islamic law, is a legal system derived from the teachings of the Quran and Hadith, the sacred texts of Islam. Sharia law encompasses all aspects of a Muslim’s life, governing social, political, and economic activities. In Nigeria, Sharia law has been a contentious issue since its introduction in 1999. Prior to the introduction of Sharia law in Nigeria, the country operated under a common law system inherited from its British colonial past. The introduction of Sharia law in Nigeria was driven by the demands of the Muslim community, who felt that the existing legal system did not adequately cater to their religious needs. However, the introduction of Sharia law was not without controversy, with some viewing it as an attempt to Islamize the country and undermine its secular character.

Presented on US Sports by: Gorilla Sportswear!
Shop our Best Sellers!
Since the adoption of a federal system of government in 1999, several northern Nigerian states introduced Sharia law as a complement to the existing legal system. The implementation of Sharia law in Nigeria has sparked heated debates and controversies, with some arguing that it is a means of promoting Islamic values and strengthening the legal system, while others contend that it is discriminatory and violates human rights. Sharia law’s implementation has been marked by controversy, including reports of human rights abuses, such as floggings, amputations, and stoning to death in areas where it is enforced. There is an ongoing debate, even among Muslim scholars and activists, regarding the compatibility of Sharia law with modern democratic values, including human rights and gender equality. Some assert that Sharia law inherently discriminates against women and non-Muslims, making it incompatible with modern notions of justice and equality. The accommodation of Sharia law in Nigeria raises fundamental questions that demand examination. How has Sharia law been integrated into the Nigerian legal system, and what are the implications for human rights, the legal system, and the socio-political landscape? These questions form the core of this study, seeking to determine whether the accommodation of Sharia law in Nigeria is constitutional and exploring potential remedies. Sharia law’s implementation in Nigeria has sparked significant controversy and debate. It has been a subject of contention since its adoption in some northern states in 1999. Initially intended to provide a legal framework for Muslims to practice their religion, Sharia law has raised concerns about its compatibility with Nigeria’s secular constitution and its potential impact on human rights. One of the main controversies centers around the use of corporal punishment, including amputations and stoning to death for certain offenses. These punishments are considered cruel and inhumane, violating international human rights standards. In response to these concerns, some states have modified the implementation of Sharia law to limit the use of corporal punishment. For instance, in Kano State, amputations have been replaced with fines, and stoning to death has not been carried out since the introduction of Sharia law. Another contentious issue is the unequal treatment of women under Sharia law. Sharia law metes out harsher punishments for offenses like adultery. In some cases, women accused of adultery have been sentenced to death by stoning, while men received less severe punishments such as flogging. In response to these concerns, some states have introduced reforms to promote gender equality within the scope of Sharia law. For example, in Kano State, women are now permitted to serve as judges in Sharia courts, and the punishment for adultery has been made more equitable for both men and women. Nigeria’s constitution guarantees freedom of religion and prohibits discrimination on religious grounds, raising questions about the constitutionality of implementing Sharia law. In response to these concerns, some states have adapted their implementation of Sharia law to ensure it aligns with the country’s secular constitution. For example, in Kaduna State, Sharia law is applied only to Muslims, while non-Muslims are subject to the secular legal system. However, these adjustments alone do not fully address the inherent conflict between Sharia law and Nigeria’s secular constitution. Section 10 of the Nigerian Constitution mandates the separation of state and religion, explicitly stating that “the Government of the Federation or of a State shall not adopt any religion as State Religion.” As such, calls for the complete abolition of Sharia law in Nigeria persist, while others argue that it should be allowed to continue in a more limited capacity. Some cases heard in Sharia courts can be appealed to the regular courts, yet the relationship between the Sharia courts and the regular legal system remains unclear. A lack of consistency and uniformity in their operation further complicates the matter. Sharia law’s implementation in Nigeria has had a notable impact on human rights, especially in areas concerning women’s rights, freedom of expression, and freedom of religion. The establishment of Sharia courts in some northern states has raised concerns over preferential treatment for Muslims and potential discrimination against non-Muslims. Furthermore, the implementation of Sharia Law has raised concerns about the constitutionality of criminal cases handled under its jurisdiction. It is argued that the application of Sharia Criminal Law in Nigeria violates the right to a fair hearing, the right to equality before the law, and the prohibition of cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment. According to J.A. Omotola, the establishment of Sharia courts in some northern states gives special treatment to Muslims and undermines the rights of non-Muslims in those states. Similarly, T. M. Ahmed argues that the adoption of Sharia Law violates the principle of secularism enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Opponents of the accommodation of Sharia Law argue that it can lead to human rights abuses, particularly against women and religious minorities. Human rights groups have accused Sharia courts of violating international human rights standards, particularly in cases involving women and religious minorities. For example, a 2017 report by Amnesty International documented cases of women and girls who were sentenced to flogging and imprisonment for alleged moral offenses, such as premarital sex and alcohol consumption. Furthermore, there are concerns about the unconstitutionality of the application of Sharia Law in Nigeria, particularly in cases involving criminal offenses. Sa’adatu Balarabe Dawakin-Tofa argues that the application of Sharia Criminal Law in Nigeria is unconstitutional, as it violates the right to a fair hearing, the right to equality before the law, and the prohibition of cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment. Similarly, Anthony A. Olabode argues that the application of Sharia Law in Nigeria violates the principle of secularism and the separation of powers enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. The implementation of Sharia Law in Nigeria has been marked by controversial and discriminatory practices. In 2002, a Sharia court in Sokoto sentenced Safiya Husseini to death by stoning for alleged adultery, despite her being a divorcee and, according to Islamic law, not subject to such punishment. The case garnered international attention and condemnation from human rights organizations and governments across the globe. Despite the controversies surrounding the accommodation of Sharia Law in the Nigerian legal system, there have been efforts to reconcile Islamic law with the provisions of Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution. One such effort was the introduction of the Sharia Penal Code in Zamfara State in 2000, aimed at aligning the application of Sharia Law with the constitutional provisions of Nigeria. However, this introduction encountered resistance from human rights groups and the federal government, which argued that it was unconstitutional and violated the principle of secularism. In 2001, the federal government established a committee to assess the implications of adopting Sharia Law in some northern states of Nigeria. The committee’s report, known as the “Sharia Report,” recommended that the federal government should take measures to ensure that the adoption of Sharia Law in Nigeria does not violate citizens’ constitutional rights and does not lead to the violation of international human rights standards. The accommodation of Sharia Law in Nigeria has drawn international attention. In 2002, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Abdelfattah Amor, visited Nigeria and expressed concern about the potential for human rights abuses under Sharia Law. The European Union has also expressed apprehension about the application of Sharia Law in Nigeria, particularly in cases involving human rights abuses. In conclusion, the operation of Sharia law in Nigeria, as well as in several other countries, stands in stark contrast to the fundamental principles of justice that underpin modern legal systems. This form of legal implementation not only undermines the very essence of justice, but it also poses a significant threat to the peace, unity, and constitutional integrity of nations. Sharia law’s rigid application, as exemplified by tragic cases like that of Meriam Ibrahim in Sudan, demonstrates a disconcerting departure from the principles of fairness, equality, and respect for individual rights. Its discriminatory treatment of women and religious minorities, often leading to harsh and inhumane punishments, serves as a stark reminder of the inherent injustices within its framework. Furthermore, the implementation of Sharia law in a multi-religious and culturally diverse nation like Nigeria raises concerns about the violation of constitutional rights. It disrupts the delicate balance between state and religion, infringing upon the constitutional provisions that guarantee freedom of religion and the separation of religion and state. This, in turn, jeopardizes the constitutional fabric of the nation and fosters divisions among its people. The detrimental effects of Sharia law on human rights, particularly in cases involving interfaith marriages and personal religious choices, underscore the urgent need for legal reform. Reforms should aim to harmonize the legal landscape with the principles of justice, equality, and the protection of fundamental human rights. Such reforms would not only promote a more just and inclusive legal system but also enhance the peace and unity of the nation. In light of the evidence presented, it becomes clear that Sharia law, in its current form and application, is inconsistent with the principles of justice, harmful to legal systems and nations, and ultimately unconstitutional in Nigeria. The time has come for a reevaluation of the role of Sharia law within the legal framework, with a steadfast commitment to upholding the constitutional rights of all citizens and ensuring a just and equitable society for everyone.

“The rights of every man are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened.” — John F. Kennedy

Versatile adventurer into writing with a passion for diverse pursuits, writing has been a constant thread in my life—evolving from a hobby to freelancing for sheer enjoyment. In the digital landscape, I've cultivated a keen interest, marrying creativity with technology. I'm a versatile individual with a passion for writing, music, law, Cinematography, performing arts and much more. Reach me at https://www.linkedin.com/in/olonade-joshua-28b717180/ and my E-mail above

Sports help kids #GetActive and learn new skills – but don’t forget about fun! Learn about @HealthGov’s National Youth Sports Strategy and help make fun the top priority in #YouthSports: https://bit.ly/2lIHPUc

The Concealed Carry Show On US Sports Radio - Avoid These Top Trauma Training & Gear Mistakes

 

Today, Riley Bowman brings an old friend of the podcast on...Brian McLaughlin! Together we will talk about the most common mistakes we see people make with their trauma kit gear and training. Makes sure you don't fall prey to these by tuning in so you don't miss! As always, any questions or suggestions for future episodes can be submitted to podcast@concealedcarry.com! The CC Show now streaming on US Sports Radio

Presented on US Sports by: Dr Berg's Electrolyte Bundle.

Dr. Berg’s Electrolyte Powder supports hydration, healthy muscles, and high energy.

The Las Vegas Raiders On US Sports Radio - Tre Tucker on Coach Kubiak, Kirk Cousins and the Offense

 

Paul Gutierrez is joined by wide receiver Tre Tucker to discuss OTAs, quarterback Kirk Cousins, Head Coach Klint Kubiak and more. Now streaming on US Sports Radio.

Presented on US Sports by: Blockchain Council.

Certified Cryptocurrency Expert™

The Rock Almighty Thursday Wake Up Call: Does the world really believe in Religion or see it as a Heritage of Disaster? And The End Of Tolerance?

-Robin G Howard

If one is to believe all that one researches on the internet regarding religion, terrifying stories of death and destruction are portrayed. We have reached the 21st Century where in many sections of the world humankind still embraces intolerance. Tolerance is over-practiced in most democratic countries to such an extent that an ensuing weakness is exposed. In countries where religion is paramount, tolerance is seen as a weakness. The democratic populations of this world accept that all free thinking individuals have a right to worship as they so desire without discrimination and bias. Some religious rulers see democracy as a threat to their way of life, and such threats are met with violent rhetoric and others with violent actions where debate is not allowed. This is not just confined to the present day but to the many factions in our religious heritage. History is filled with theological disasters that have plagued humanity through three thousand years. These nightmares of reality have been forgotten in the stealthy progress of time. This article sets out some of those anomalies of the religions of man.

What is religion? The dictionary definition is:

1. Belief in, worship of, or obedience to a supernatural power or powers considered to be divine or to have control of human destiny. 
2. 2. Any formal or institutionalized expression of such belief. 3. The attitude and feeling of one who believes in a transcendent controlling power or powers.

Presented on US Sports by: Champion Sportswear.

25% off Shorts, Pants, T-Shirts & Tops

Taking this to a basic level, you and you alone choose or create your religion. You believe, you worship and you are obedient to a supernatural source. You can personally follow any religion in the world or create your own. Naturally, many world religions are now established institutions created centuries ago in an unenlightened age. A time when man struggled to find the meaning of life and religions created war to control minds and vast quantities of land. The people were starved of knowledge and kept in their place by doctrine. In the far distant past man worshipped the sun, the moon and other Gods. In Greece and later Rome, people believed their Gods were like adult humans. They would argue, have children play music and party. It was important for them to please their Gods. An unhappy God would bring punishment and death. They even believed that stones or rock contained spirits especially boundary stones. Another belief was that werewolves roamed and attacked herds at night, returning to human form at daybreak. The religions affected politics because they were riddled with superstitions. Epileptic fits were deemed grave and serious at meetings of the senate. In 114BC a vestal virgin was killed by a lightning strike. To allay the anger of the Gods such a bad omen was appeased by burying alive, two couples, one Greek and one Gallic. Roman religion was undermined by Greek philosophy and then came the suggested idea of a single God.

In relation to historical fact, the gray area of Christianity came into being. The birth date of Jesus, a Jewish leader, historically speaking, was uncertain. His birth pinpointed to AD 1 is a judgment made 500 years after the event. The stories told of him circulated from person to person through the ages. Paul of Tarsus famed for his missionary voyages into the empire spread the new religion for non-Jews mainly by word of mouth. The turnabout came in Ad 380 when Christians ruled the empire. The result of the definition of heresy (people who disagreed with official Christianity) was religious suppression and slaughter. In the inquisition brutal torture became the normal procedure and Christian slaughtered Christian and anyone else who did not follow the hazy official doctrine.

The Pontiffs carried on in line like monarchs, with their armies, administration and territory. One Pontiff had six sons and three daughters by several women. Another had three daughters whilst a Cardinal, and was a fierce warrior who wore silver armour and crushed anyone who defied his authority. One Pope was poisoned and clubbed to death whilst another was imprisoned and strangled. Corruption and the selling of spiritual blessings for money led Martin Luther to start the reformation in 1517.

The prophet Mohammed lived around 570-632 and came from a family of traders. Mohammed mediated the religion’s book of revelation the Koran, the beliefs of Islam. He completes a succession of prophets, including Abraham, Moses and Jesus. All refined and restated the message of God. Doing research on the internet from the public domain the dark side of Islam reveals certain areas that cause logic and science to shiver with apprehension. It is a religion that has 123 verses in the Qur’an about killing and fighting for Allah. Mohammed the founder of Islam said, "Invitation first," (an offer to embrace Islam) "If refused, then war". The sword is the key of heaven and hell. Whosoever falls in battle his sins will be forgiven." This gives the notion that dying for Jihad for Allah results in direct entry into paradise. The Popes of the Crusade era made the same promise, a promise of spiritual forgiveness of murder and slaughter.

In Japan in the year 1281 a great Typhoon destroyed an invading Mongol army and became known as the kamikaze or divine wind. In the Second World War the dominant Shinto religion of Japan decreed that the Emperor was a descendant of the Gods and a God in his own right. Thus, the kamikaze pilot came into being with a brainwashing technique that they would earn through death in combat, a free trip to heaven. They had small books in their pockets with self belief text to spur them on. Young men between 16 and 20 were recruited to give their lives. One of the items in the book was: Transcend life and death. When you eliminate all thoughts about life and death, you will be able to totally disregard your earthly life. This will also enable you to concentrate your attention on eradicating the enemy with unwavering determination, meanwhile reinforcing your excellence in flight skills.

The Germans also developed a suicide weapon, Selbstopfer. Flying bombs with a small cockpit on top were being tested. Fortunately the weapon was not used in combat possibly because there was no spiritual or religious following to condone it, but the Nazis were brilliant at propaganda and brainwashing and if the war had continued who knows what would have happened.

Hinduism from the ancient Indians is more spiritually complex. A Hindu may worship more than one God, or just one God, he can be an agnostic or atheist. Ancient Indian texts contain exact scientific calculations. The speed of light, the age of the universe are all in ancient texts. How can this be so to modern scientific calculations? A text on astronomy thought to be compiled in 1000 BC and believed to be handed down from 3000 BC by recital gives the earth’s diameter and distance from the moon. As far as we know it is the only religion on earth which gives a fairly accurate time-scale of the earth and universe, 8.4 billion years.

Buddhism has its origins about 2500 years ago. A man, Siddhartha Gotama, known as the Buddha was enlightened at the age of 35. Buddhism is very spiritual and more of a philosophy or way of life. Wisdom should be sought with compassion. It has the answers to problems of a materialistic nature and nurtures a code of practice. Tolerant of other religions and beliefs and in agreement with the moral teachings of other religions, wars and slaughter of fellow men has never occurred in the name of Buddhism.

Eastern religions express the idea of reincarnation. Formulated in India it spread to, and was later adapted into Chinese Taoism about the 3rd century BC. Platonism states the existence of the soul in a celestial world returning to the human body through sin. In order to return to a state of pure being the soul is purified through reincarnation. The Tibetan book of the dead alleges experiences between two incarnations and mentions a mental body.

From 1517 came various Christian Churches. Historians trace the early Baptist Church to 1609 in Amsterdam and believe John Smyth as the founder. They apposed infant baptism and that baptism should only be performed on believers. He stated that true worship was from the heart and that any reading from a book in worship was an invention of sinful men. He would not allow the reading of the bible during worship saying the translations were the work of man. The Baptist Church formed in 1639 by Roger Williams spread to the North American colonies.

Unitarianism came from Transylvania in 1600 introduced into Britain in 1668 and 1673. It was not fully legal in Britain until 1813.

Jehovah’s Witnesses was founded in the late 19th century as a Bible study group they retranslated the Bible from the teachings of Charles Taze Russell. Their predictions have been sadly wrong. After Russell’s death, Joseph Franklin Rutherford a trial lawyer and prosecutor took over resulting in a leadership battle where he was accused of autocratic behaviour losing one seventh of its membership. The end of times has been predicted from 1914.

The Church of Scientology was founded in 1954 by an American science fiction author named L.Ron Hubbard. He was a blood brother of the Blackfoot Indians at the age of six. After studying nearly all religions, he produced complex and profound beliefs in this modern age. After his death, the church has been quoted as a cult society. Scientologists cannot live or associate with non members even if they are close family. They recruit young seals – dominating young minds. Fixed donations are required; some have called it a pay as you go religion. The church leaders play mind games with people who appose them. The church is believed to be based on a secretive issue called Lord Xenu.

Summary:

Can a terrorist group exist within the framework of religion? Once again religion is: belief in, worship of, or obedience to a supernatural power or powers considered to be divine or to have control of human destiny. Therefore, a terrorist group would be worshipping a God that instructed bloodlust, murder and slaughter. This would be their interpretation of their beliefs and their God.

Suicide warriors are a dark part of history, brainwashed by other religious people into believing that life is cheap and that they will reap a spiritual reward. It is also strange to realize that always the young are ensnared into this bizarre thinking. Do the leaders or the older members of their organizations strap on bombs and kill as many people as they can? No, otherwise there would be no leaders to brainwash and create the atrocities.

In regard to lord Xenu, I am sure that Ron Hubbard would have done research on Atlantis at some time in his career. I have an open mind as to Atlantis, nothing can be proved or disproved that a race of advanced humans commanded by a warlord existed. In fact it does answer some of the problems we are having today and where the technological advancement of society has come from. In the story from Plato the warlord’s actions cause dissension and many break away from his rule.

In religious teachings there are no physical warriors for God and if there are such leanings, they are from man.

So be careful in what you believe.

This article is from science fiction author Robin G Howard. The new (4th in the series) Jim long space agent book –Divine Fanaticism is released as a paperback edition on Nov.1st. Order from a bookstore or http://www.allinterestbooks.co.uk or the author site at http://www.authorsite-JL.com

Ezine owners please feel free to distribute the free report and this review to your lists without changing any texts.

Want to help kids stick with sports? Prioritize fun and #PhysicalActivity over competition in #YouthSports programs. Learn more in @HealthGov’s National Youth Sports Strategy: https://bit.ly/2lQ85f6

The Rock Almighty Wednesday Wake-Up Call: Mary of Bethany: An Example of Faith and Christ Is Rising In This Fallen World.

Mary of Bethany is the woman who poured ointment upon the head of Christ, and for this act Jesus said that wherever the gospel would be preached “throughout the whole world, this also that she hath done shall be spoken of for a memorial of her” (Mark 14:9).

I do not suppose Mary of Bethany is often thought of so even spoken of in this day and age, but, nonetheless, Jesus said this woman would be remembered.

Mary Served as an Example of FAITH.

Just days before He was to be crucified, Jesus returned to Bethany, and there He was in the home of one Simon the leper - to have a meal, and at that dinner a woman (Mary) anointed Jesus with a very expensive ointment.

Presented on US Sports by: 

American National Standards Institute Inc. 

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Standard

Notice what the Bible says about that dinner: "And there they made him supper; and Marts served: but Lazarus was one of them that sat at the table with him" John 12:2).

This dinner took place after Lazarus had been raised from the dead and notice Martha - the sister of Lazarus - was at that dinner serving dinner. No doubt, the dinner was in celebration of the resurrection of Lazarus - for the Bible tells us that Jesus came to Bethany “… where Lazarus was which had been dead, whom he raised from the dead” (John 12:1). But even while this celebration of the resurrection of Lazarus was in the minds of the people there, Jesus, was also with a heavy heart -as the reality of his soon coming crucifixion and suffering would have been on his mind; and so, it was in this circumstance Mary of Bethany then surprised everyone by taking an expensive ointment to anoint Jesus Christ.

But upon anointing Jesus with the very expensive oil, Judas - the one who betrayed Christ was very upset saying: "Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?" (John 12:5).

Judah had the wrong attitude - because instead of respecting Mary’s act of service and generosity, Judah, thought it was wasteful for her to anoint Jesus with such an expensive item - arguing it should, instead have been sold and given to the poor - while that was not at all Juda’s true intent - for the scripture says that it was not because Judah cared for the poor but because he was a thief and just wanted to be in possession of the oil (John 12:6). But also notice that the other disciples also found fault with what Mary did and agreed with Judas - for the scripture says: “But when his disciples saw it, they had indignation, saying, to what purpose is this waste” (Matthew 26:8). Think of it, the very disciples of Jesus Christ thought Mary act of anointing Jesus with expensive oil was a wasteful thing to do.

But in response to the anger of the disciples over the ointment, notice what Jesus said: "When Jesus understood it; he said unto them, why trouble ye the woman? for she hath wrought a good work upon me" (Matthew 26:10). Perhaps another person - a normal carnal human being might have gotten very angry - feeling insulted that their friends or people thought it was a waste for someone to do such good to them, but instead of getting angry and all upset at the negative comment of the disciples, Jesus calmly and straightforwardly told the disciples that the woman (Mary) was doing a good thing for Him; and there is no doubt, the disciples, at some point, would come to regret saying what they said and repented of it.

Mary’s Faith

Mary apparently believes Jesus when he said He came to Jerusalem to die, and she may not have understood the full meaning of his death for all mankind, but she did believe what He said; she believed his word and did not doubt or question that Jesus was going to die; she just believed what He said and acted upon that belief by anointing Him with oil - doing the very best she thought she could do for Him before he died. The disciples who were with Jesus should have known better - by having proper respect and appreciation for Mary’s service of love and faith in Christ, but they did not; they failed to see and understand what she was doing, but Christ knew what she did and praised this woman for it.

For the true servants of God or Christian, Mary stands as an example of faith, trust and commitment to God. Though she was chided for her service by those closest to Jesus and though she probably did not fully understand what Jesus' death was to mean, she believed what He said and she served.

There are millions today who profess to believe on Christ, but unlike Mary, they do NOT actually believe all that Christ says -as they are willing to call Him Lord and yet not believe Him or what He says; For example, Jesus Spake these words - saying: "Think not that I am come to destroy the law or the prophets: I am not come to destroy but to fulfill" (Matt. 5:17).

Mary would have certainly believed that Jesus did not come to do away with the ten commandments of God - for Jesus told us to NOT think that He came to do any such thing, and yet, the millions who profess to believe on Christ disagree with Christ; they do NOT believe what He says, but has their own belief that since they are under grace the law of God has been abolished - done away - no law to obey; such do not believe Christ; they do not take Him at his word. Mary of Bethany believed Christ and gave her all by doing the very best for Him and for her faith - by believing in what He said and who He is really is; and for this, Jesus said this woman would be remembered to this very day; she would not be forgotten. With this in mind, I hope that the readers here will, indeed, take a moment to think of Mary of Bethany; to remember her humble service and the willingness to serve and honor her savior - offering to him the very best physical offering she had to offer. This woman is an example of faith and trust in God -and in her act of service to Christ, she at that moment in time, could see even more deeply than the disciples who had spent so much time with Christ.

There are many in this world who say they believe on Christ but do not do what He says or commands them to do, but Mary of Bethany believed Christ, and she showed it in her service to Him; it is no wonder Mary of Bethany is remembered and spoken of today - just as Jesus said she would.

https://www.amazon.com/America-Prophecy-Israel-people-consider-ebook/dp/B0C4M8R77J

I am an old man who has, long ago, came to the realization that this professing Christian world – with all its Mega Churches and various denominations do not proclaim the true teaching of the Bible - as they fail to correctly teach many vitally important doctrinal truths of the Bible.

Want to help kids stick with sports? Prioritize fun and #PhysicalActivity over competition in #YouthSports programs. Learn more in @HealthGov’s National Youth Sports Strategy: https://bit.ly/2lQ85f6