US Sports Net Today!


Live Play-by-Play, Updates, Highlights and More! on US Sports Network!
[Chrome Users-You may have to click on the play button twice to listen]
US Sports Network Powered By Beast Sports Nutrition!




US Sports Radio
The Las Vegas Raiders Play Here
Fitness and Sports Performance Info You Can Use!
The Scoreboard Mall
The Rock Almighty Shaker Of Heaven And Earth!
The Coolest Links In The Universe!

Sunday, June 24, 2012

Demand this new breast cancer test

Online Publishing and Marketing

New Breakthrough in Breast Screening
Overcomes Major Shortcoming of Mammograms 

By Mindy Tyson McHorse, Contributing Editor


    One of the biggest tragedies in the cancer epidemic is that science and technology gives a lot of people false hope. Especially women.


    Today's example: Too many women — and particularly those at high risk for breast cancer — don't realize that mammograms are hardly effective. Yes, they detect some tumors, but more than a third of breast cancers are missed in women with dense breasts. And more than 40% of women in the U.S. have dense breasts.


    That means mammography gives women false comfort that they're free of disease, when in fact they have tumors getting bigger every day. They just don't know it, because their dense tissue masks the appearance of tumors. Now technology has come up with a new solution — but you'll have to overcome some foot-dragging by doctors if you want to benefit. Keep reading and I'll explain...


Continued below. . .



Breast Cancer Breakthrough BANNED!
U.S. Government Blocks Release
of Doctor's Life-Saving Book
    A mammoth discovery is wiping out most breast tumors better than anything seen yet in modern medicine. It makes surgery, radiation and chemotherapy look like something from the Dark Ages.

    A Cornell-educated doctor followed more than 25 years of case studies and PROVED this treatment can cure breast cancer. With the discovery I'm going to tell you about, almost every woman makes it and without losing a breast to surgery or taking any toxic chemicals. Even those with late stage cancer!

    You've got to include this treatment if you want to have any REAL hope of defeating breast cancer. Click here now and watch a new video presentation about this important discovery…


    Several studies confirm that as tissue density increases, a mammogram's ability to detect lesions plummets. A mammogram done on a woman with dense breast tissues will show white areas where dense tissue is found. But the problem is, cancers also show up as white areas.


    Worse still, women with dense breast tissue are four to six times more likely to develop breast cancer. So you've got a huge group of women with the highest risk possible for this awful disease, who don't know they're at an elevated risk and have no way to reliably detect tumors.


    But there may be a solution on the horizon, at least in terms of early detection. It's called the Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS), and it appears to detect 30% more cancers in women with dense breasts who have normal mammograms. Better yet, it's in the process of becoming a required part of the screening process.


    A study in the September 2009 issue of European Radiology showed that automated, whole-breast ultrasound doubles the rate of cancer detection in women with high breast cancer risk and dense breasts. Even more incredible, it tripled the detection rate for cancers smaller than 10 mm. These findings provide plenty of justification for adding it to a widespread screening routine.


    This is important, because early detection is still one of the best ways to beat existing cancer. In fact, according to the American Cancer Society, early detection means a survival rate of 96%.
How do you know if you have dense breasts?
    Breast density has nothing to do with the way a woman's breasts feel during an exam. It's got more to do with having more gland tissue (which makes and drains milk), along with supportive tissue (called stroma) that surrounds the gland. Dense breast tissue is hereditary, though it can affect women of all races.

    The simple answer to figuring out breast density is this: Take the volume of dense tissue in a woman and divide it by the volume of her breasts, then multiply by 100 for a percentage, and you have her tissue density. But what woman is able to figure out her own breast tissue volume?

    Instead, we rely on our medical system, and therein lies the problem. Currently, radiologists and physicians have access to tissue density information, but often withhold that precious information from patients.

    Just look at what's happening in California. There's a Senate Bill pending that would require mammogram providers to tell patients about their breast tissue density when their mammogram result letters are mailed out, since many doctors don't share this information.

    A similar bill was introduced last year and passed both the State Assembly and Senate, but was vetoed by Governor Jerry Brown, who echoed the concerns of the California Medical Association. They thought the required language — i.e., letting women know dense breast tissue puts them at higher risk and that they might benefit from additional screening — would cause women "unnecessary anxiety."

    Thank goodness at least for advocate and breast cancer survivor Amy Colton of California, who was diagnosed with advanced-stage breast cancer. She had three invasive tumors that her doctor said had probably been there for seven years. During those seven years she'd been getting "normal" mammogram results. Colton testified that both her physician and her radiologist knew she had dense breast tissue, but never told her that put her at higher risk, so she never knew to look into supplemental screening.

    Colton since has undergone sixteen rounds of chemotherapy, five surgeries, and six weeks of daily radiation, all because her regular mammograms gave her a treacherously false sense of security.
Proof it works
    That's one of the reasons automated breast ultrasound is so important. Not only is it better at detecting malignancies in dense breast tissue, it's also on the verge of being approved as a regular cancer screening tool. That way, women with dense breasts can be screened upfront instead of waiting to be informed they have dense tissue and then waiting for supplemental screenings.

    We've been waiting on this for a while. The technology for automated breast ultrasound was first cleared for diagnostic use in 2005. In October of 2008, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved its use to help diagnose women with abnormalities suspected to be breast cancer. But it still didn't become part of the routine screening process.

    Fortunately, in April of this year an expert panel for the FDA recommended that automated ultrasound be approved for regular breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts. And moving the process forward one more step, last month the FDA said the ABUS system was "approvable" pending audits of the manufacturing processes. (The ABUS was created by U-Systems, Inc. and is distributed by Siemens.)

    According to the study in the September 2009 European Radiology mentioned earlier, whole-breast ultrasound (ABUS) found 32 out of 49 cancers in women with dense breasts, whereas mammography by itself found only 19 of the 49.
You can't know "too much" about your own health
    Seems to me it's a woman's right to know whether she has dense tissue and needs additional screening. It doesn't make sense for doctors not to tell women about elevated risk. And if money is their big concern (isn't that always the case?), they should consider that early detection and treatment saves tens of thousands of dollars over treating advanced-stage cancer — not to mention saving lives.

    So on one hand, it's great to know technology is advancing and improving. But fancy technology is pointless unless it gets integrated into routine diagnostic tests so real people can reap real advantages.

    In the meantime, any woman with dense breast tissue is advised to make sensible lifestyle choices to keep cancer risk at a minimum — like eating healthy food, limiting alcohol, staying at a healthy weight, exercising on a regular basis, and not smoking.

    And if you're a woman and don't know whether your tissue is dense, keep asking till you find someone willing to tell you the truth about your risk.

    Last month, the California bill passed unanimously in the Senate. Next step is the Assembly. And while California awaits the verdict, Texas and Virginia have also enacted breast density inform bills. Several other states are working on similar legislation, and Connecticut has already passed a law.

    And, in the fall of 2011 a federal bill was introduced that would require radiologists to inform mammogram recipients of dense tissue.

    I hate to say we'll have to wait and see, so if you're a woman, make sure you ask your doctor about your tissue density level. Unlike the Governor of California and his doctor friends, I don't think there's such a thing as "too much information" when it comes to your health.

    And if you've been told you have breast cancer, what then? Cancer Defeated publishes a guide on what to do called Breast Cancer Cover-Up. It reviews the best options for treatment, as we see them. The Special Report also covers thermography, a screening test for breast cancer that we think is far superior to mammography. (Mammography — in addition to being inaccurate — actually CAUSES cancer with its massive annual doses of radiation). Click here to learn more about this Special Report.

    And men have problems of their own when it comes to screening and early detection for cancer. It seems there's new evidence that the PSA test is nearly useless. If you missed this important news, please scroll down and read it now.

Government Experts Throw in the Towel
on the PSA Test
    After at least two decades of touting it as the gold standard for prostate screening, the medical establishment appears to be turning its back on the popular PSA test.

    In a May 2012 statement from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), co-chair Michael LeFevre, M.D., said that "men deserve to know what the science tells us about PSA screening: there is a very small potential benefit and significant potential harms."

    This pretty much has been my stance all along! Keep reading and see why the PSA test has been such a disaster...

Continued below...
"How to Make a Cancer Tumor
Dissolve in 40 Seconds"

    There's an amazing video that shows how a woman's cancer tumor was dissolved in 40 seconds!


    The orange-sized tumor disappeared in front of everyone's eyes withoutsurgery—and without anyone ever touching her body—while a video camera filmed the ultrasound screen showing the tumor dissolving in real-time.


     The video footage is incredible. Click here to watch the 5-minute video that will convince you that cancer is, indeed, curable.


    The touch-free healing practice that dissolved the tumor is just one of the top natural cancer cures that health practitioners have hailed as the "best of the best." In the video, you'll discover 5 equally powerful natural cancer cures that deliver stunning results. You're not likely to hear about these from your doctor.

    The government group is now saying that the 'cons' of having the test generally outweigh the 'pros' for most men under age 75.

    The 'cons' are nasty indeed: If this unreliable test indicates a man may have prostate cancer, the next step is a biopsy. This is a highly invasive test in which small samples of tissue are cut out of the organ to be examined for cancer cells.

    A biopsy can result in pain, fever, bleeding, infections and problems urinating. Worst of all, if cancer cells are actually present, it can spread them.

    After all this risk and discomfort, the biopsy will often show no cancer is present — because the PSA test that prompted the biopsy in the first place is so often wrong.
And what if you DO have cancer?
    Let's suppose the biopsy does find cancer. What then? The most likely next steps are surgery or radiation. You might think, "Wonderful, the PSA test led to early detection and treatment!"

    Not so fast. Most prostate tumors are pretty harmless. Surgery and radiation are NOT needed. The best option is to do nothing. So, in reality, the PSA test has led to overtreatment. And the treatments can lead to lifelong incontinence or impotence, not to mention a lot of pain, expense, lost work days and who knows what else.

    Well, actually, we do know what else: the fear, stress and anxiety of worrying about a cancer that didn't pose a threat.

    Each year about 1,000 to 1,300 men die from complications connected to treatments that took place because the victims had a high PSA score.

    As I've written in this space before, only about one prostate cancer out of ten is aggressive and therefore life-threatening. In a large study called the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, only 28% of men in their 60s who had a high PSA score turned out to have cancer as shown by a biopsy — slightly more than one man out of four.

    The rest — 72 out of a hundred -- had a high PSA score, but NO CANCER.

    And of those who had cancer, only about one out of ten died of it. To be exact, 3 died out of every 28 men whose biopsies showed cancer. And don't forget, that's 3 out of the 100 who had a high PSA score at the beginning of this whole mess.

    I want to underscore this: Out of a hundred men with a high PSA score only 28 had cancer and only three died of it.

    This test is all but worthless, and that's what the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force now confirms. The USPSTF reviewed previous research on this subject, including two large studies in the U.S. and Europe. When they compared men who were routinely screened with the PSA test and those who were not, there was no difference in death rates over a ten-year follow-up.

    Again, I want to underscore this: Men who were tested like the dickens for prostate cancer were just as likely to be six feet under a decade later as those who weren't tested at all.

    Now, there's a curious twist to this story. Most studies have focused on five-year survival rates, and found that PSA-screened men ARE more likely to survive more than five years. Why doesn't that hold up when you look at a ten-year time frame?
All you get is more years of worry
    It's actually simple, when you think about: Finding cancer earlier means you live longer knowing you have it.

    Consider an example: If John Smith died of cancer in 2010 and it was first diagnosed in 2006, he's not a five-year survivor. But say he had a PSA test in 2003 and a biopsy then detected cancer. He still dies in 2010 — but, bingo! Now he's a seven-year survivor!

    And that's exactly why the PSA test, biopsies and aggressive treatment are trumpeted as increasing five-year survival rates. The men do NOT live longer. They die at the same time they would have anyway. But the cancer is detected earlier and in the official records those men beat the five-year mark.

    When the USPFTF focused on ten-year survival rates, they exposed this bogus claim of success, and the PSA test was revealed to be almost worthless.

    The group advocates putting a halt to PSA screening tests unless a person "makes the personal decision that even a small possibility of benefit outweighs the known risk of harms."

    The panel said the best option would be to pursue better testing and treatment options. Clearly, what's needed most is a test to identify aggressive cancers and distinguish them from slow-growing cancers that — in men over 60 — could be left untreated. There's some action on this front, but no reliable test yet, as far as I know.
Watch the trend, some doctors say
    Supposedly there IS a way to get some good out of the PSA test — observe the trend over a series of tests. If you're tested every six months and the PSA score is trending up, some doctors say it indicates an aggressive cancer may be present. Biopsies and more aggressive treatment may be warranted.

    Quite a few urologists and oncologists are now working on this assumption, but I don't know how much evidence there is to support it. For what it's worth, I have a dog in this fight. My PSA number is slightly elevated and increased very slightly over the past year. I'm not alarmed, but I'll get tested again in six months and see if there's an uptrend.

    It's called "watchful waiting" — and it's by far the most sensible strategy for most men who have a high PSA score and even for those who are told they have a tumor.

    Urologists and even general practitioners are reluctant to give up on the PSA test. They continue to use as if it means something. My guess is that most men middle-aged and up are still being regularly tested. "Do nothing" is not an appealing strategy to most people — and that includes patients, who are easily panicked into biopsies, and then into radiation or surgery, when a doctor starts throwing around the "C" word.

Cal Visits Povich Field! Big Train beat Orioles 12-1!

Watch MLB online - Click here to Sign up for MLB.tv!

Cal Ripken Visits Povich Field
Cal1

Saturday's game against the Youse's Orioles came with a special treat for Povich Field attendees. Oriole Hall-of-Famer Cal Ripken Jr. was in attendance to watch his son, Ryan, play against the Big Train.

Cal also brought Lynda Carter and her husband, Robert Altman, to the game with him. Carter is best known for her portrayal as the DC Comics superhero Wonder Woman on television throughout the 1970's. Her husband, Robert Altman, is the current chairman and CEO of ZeniMax Media, the parent company of Bethesda Softworks LLC, a nationally renowned video game company.
Cal3 
After the game, hundreds of fans stayed at Povich for their chance to meet Cal. He was happy to oblige, but not before meeting with the Big Train's star player and center fielder Hunter Renfroe (Mississippi State). Cal2
Cal with Zach Randolph (left) and Hunter Renfroe (right). 

Big Train Bats Continue to Produce
as Big Train Trounce Orioles 12-1


Renfroe4 

The ball leaving Renfroe's bat (and Povich Field) on his first inning grand slam.

Though the Big Train were not technically the home team on Saturday night, you would have had a lot of trouble figuring that out. The game was played at Povich Field and the Big Train played as if they were at home sweet home and demolished the Orioles by a score of 12-1.The Big Train got on the board early as Michael Bass (UNC-Wilmington) walked, Brendan Hendriks (San Francisco) reached on an error, andAdam Barry (Cal State Northridge) was hit by a pitch. That broughtHunter Renfroe (Mississippi State) to the plate to hit the Big Train's first grand slam of the season.

The Orioles had it just as bad in the second inning. After Brennan Middleton (Tulane) was hit by a pitch and Bass walked again, Hendrikssingled to bring in a run. Then Barry singled and Renfroe walked leading to a bases-loaded single from Tucker Tobin (George Mason) to score another run. After an error by the right fielder brought home two more, the score stood at 8-0 after just two innings.

While the big innings were over, the Big Train were not done scoring. Four more runs would go up on the board before the end of the game compared to just one from the Orioles. The biggest of those runs wasRenfore's second home run of the night.

Ryan Doran (San Diego State) starred on the mound for the Big Train as he had a no-hitter through 4.1 innings with the score 11-0. He ended up getting the win after pitching five innings on just one hit and no walks while striking out five.

Saturday, June 23, 2012

Big Train-Braves Game Postponed


Soggy Povich Field Postpones Friday's Game


Players, Volunteers and Game Night Staff crowd the Press Box to avoid the storm.

Mother Nature's will was greater than that of the baseball gods last night, as heavy rain and lightning postponed the showdown against the Herndon Braves. The game will be made up on Wednesday, July 2ndin part one of a double-header beginning at 5 p.m. All tickets purchased to last night's game are valid for any future 2012 regular season Big Train game. 

Friday, June 22, 2012

SPORTS AND LEARNING CENTER TRACK NAMED IN HONOR OF LARRY COLBERT




SPORTS AND LEARNING CENTER TRACK NAMED IN HONOR OF LARRY COLBERT

(LANDOVER, Md. – June 16, 2012)  The Prince George’s County Executive, the Prince George’s County Council, and the Prince George’s County Planning Board of The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission honored Bowie State University Assistant Track and Field Coach Lawrence “Larry” Colbert with a plaque unveiling ceremony.
“Thank you to the staff at Bowie State University for the opportunity to expand my coaching abilities to the college level. Having this opportunity to coach alongside Coach Latimer has been a most rewarding experience and one that I will always treasure”, said Colbert.
Coach Latimer said, “It has been an honor having such a wonderful man of standard on my staff
as lead assistant coach. He is a man of excellence and goes far beyond the call of duty by doing more than others expect. He is one that maintains high standards”, said Latimer.
Mr. Colbert was a long time resident of Prince George’s County, and was recognized by the County Council in May 2011 for his “Exemplary Public Service” in the county over the years. His services included being an active member in the establishment of the Glenarden Track Club, a former track and field coach at Eleanor Roosevelt High School, and an assistant field house manager at the Prince George’s Sports & Learning Complex.
“Coach Colbert has long been a pillar of excellence in the local track community. His contributions to the track community cannot be adequately measured. So many individuals have benefited from his contributions, many of them directly and even more indirectly. He definitely deserves all the accolades presented to him. The BSU Athletic Department also joins in thanking him for all he has done for us and the community”, said Athletic Director Anton Goff.

Thursday, June 21, 2012

National Champs, Bats come to live against River Dogs


Big Train Bats Come Alive,
Pummel Riverdogs in Eleven


Tobin1
Tucker Tobin was one of the Big Train players who stepped up on Wednesday night.

The Big Train traveled to Vienna last night with revenge on their minds after losing to the River Dogs 9-4 on June 9th. That loss was avenged as some outstanding performances led to an incredible 16-11 win in extra innings.

The Big Train started off with a one-run lead after a walk and three hit batsmen brought a run across the plate in the first inning. However, the Big Train would give up five in the bottom of the inning and trail 5-1.

In the third inning, the Big Train looked destined for a quiet inning untilColin Kish (Florida Southern) singled and Cole Norton (St. Mary's (CA)) drove a ball over the left-center field fence. But the Riverdogs scored two of their own in the third to make the score 7-3.

Norton would strike again in the fifth inning. After a Tucker Tobin(George Mason) walk and another Kish single, Norton tripled to deep center to score both his teammates and eventually crossed the plate himself on a Brennan Middleton (Tulane) RBI groundout. But once again, the Riverdogs would match the Big Train and score three as well in the bottom of the inning.

In the sixth, a two-out Hunter Renfroe (Mississippi State) single kept a rally alive and brought Tobin to the plate where his three-run homer closed the gap to 10-9.

The team was able to tie the game in the seventh as a Mitch Morales(Florida Atlantic) double scored Norton who had led off the inning with a single.

Cameron Cuneo (UC Santa Barbara) pitched the last five of the regulation nine innings for the Big Train and gave up just one run in his first Big Train appearance. Cuneo's left-handed sidearm delivery baffled hitters all night. His slider was particularly effective and few balls even left the infield. Cuneo commented on that pitch, as well as his fastball, after the game.

"It's been my go to for a while," Cuneo said. "I really got a feel for that fastball inside. I got more behind it than I usually do."

The Big Train would essentially finish the game in the 11th inning as they were able to put six runs up on the scoreboard. Kish doubled to lead off the inning and was followed by a Norton walk and Middletonsingle to load the bases. Morales stepped up to the plate and drilled a two-RBI single to put the Big Train ahead for good. Michael Bass (UNC-Wilmington) then drew his third walk of the night to reload the bases and Brendan Hendriks (San Francisco) hit a sacrifice fly to score another run. A couple of miscues by the Riverdogs and a double byTobin left the score at 16-10.

The bottom of the eleventh brought one run in for the Riverdogs butHugh Adams (Florida Atlantic) was able to shut the door and pick up the win.

Big Train Manager Sal Colangelo was happy with the effort of his players after the game and singled out a player who he thinks will have an impact on the team's results.

"Our guys didn't quit. They continued to fight and try to get better and get after it," Colangelo said. "There's one guy who is going to be the 'X factor' on this team and that's Cole. If he can get it rolling, we're going to go."

Look for the Big Train to carry that momentum back home to Povich Field tonight, as they will open a four-game home stand against the DC Grays at 7:30 PM.

The box score for last's night's game can be viewed here and for tickets to tonight's game, click here Watch Tonight's game live 7:30pm EST on US Sports Network

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Experts give up on the PSA test

Online Publishing and Marketing

Government Experts Throw in the Towel
on the PSA Test


    After at least two decades of touting it as the gold standard for prostate screening, the medical establishment appears to be turning its back on the popular PSA test.


    In a May 2012 statement from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), co-chair Michael LeFevre, M.D., said that "men deserve to know what the science tells us about PSA screening: there is a very small potential benefit and significant potential harms."


    This pretty much has been my stance all along! Keep reading and see why the PSA test has been such a disaster...


Continued below...

"How to Make a Cancer Tumor
Dissolve in 40 Seconds"

    There's an amazing video that shows how a woman's cancer tumor was dissolved in 40 seconds!


    The orange-sized tumor disappeared in front of everyone's eyes withoutsurgery—and without anyone ever touching her body—while a video camera filmed the ultrasound screen showing the tumor dissolving in real-time.


     The video footage is incredible. Click here to watch the 5-minute video that will convince you that cancer is, indeed, curable.


    The touch-free healing practice that dissolved the tumor is just one of the top natural cancer cures that health practitioners have hailed as the "best of the best." In the video, you'll discover 5 equally powerful natural cancer cures that deliver stunning results. You're not likely to hear about these from your doctor.


    The government group is now saying that the 'cons' of having the test generally outweigh the 'pros' for most men under age 75.


    The 'cons' are nasty indeed: If this unreliable test indicates a man may have prostate cancer, the next step is a biopsy. This is a highly invasive test in which small samples of tissue are cut out of the organ to be examined for cancer cells.


    A biopsy can result in pain, fever, bleeding, infections and problems urinating. Worst of all, if cancer cells are actually present, it can spread them.


    After all this risk and discomfort, the biopsy will often show no cancer is present — because the PSA test that prompted the biopsy in the first place is so often wrong.
And what if you DO have cancer?
    Let's suppose the biopsy does find cancer. What then? The most likely next steps are surgery or radiation. You might think, "Wonderful, the PSA test led to early detection and treatment!"

    Not so fast. Most prostate tumors are pretty harmless. Surgery and radiation are NOT needed. The best option is to do nothing. So, in reality, the PSA test has led to overtreatment. And the treatments can lead to lifelong incontinence or impotence, not to mention a lot of pain, expense, lost work days and who knows what else.

    Well, actually, we do know what else: the fear, stress and anxiety of worrying about a cancer that didn't pose a threat.

    Each year about 1,000 to 1,300 men die from complications connected to treatments that took place because the victims had a high PSA score.

    As I've written in this space before, only about one prostate cancer out of ten is aggressive and therefore life-threatening. In a large study called the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, only 28% of men in their 60s who had a high PSA score turned out to have cancer as shown by a biopsy — slightly more than one man out of four.

    The rest — 72 out of a hundred -- had a high PSA score, but NO CANCER.

    And of those who had cancer, only about one out of ten died of it. To be exact, 3 died out of every 28 men whose biopsies showed cancer. And don't forget, that's 3 out of the 100 who had a high PSA score at the beginning of this whole mess.

    I want to underscore this: Out of a hundred men with a high PSA score only 28 had cancer and only three died of it.

    This test is all but worthless, and that's what the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force now confirms. The USPSTF reviewed previous research on this subject, including two large studies in the U.S. and Europe. When they compared men who were routinely screened with the PSA test and those who were not, there was no difference in death rates over a ten-year follow-up.

    Again, I want to underscore this: Men who were tested like the dickens for prostate cancer were just as likely to be six feet under a decade later as those who weren't tested at all.

    Now, there's a curious twist to this story. Most studies have focused on five-year survival rates, and found that PSA-screened men ARE more likely to survive more than five years. Why doesn't that hold up when you look at a ten-year time frame?
All you get is more years of worry
    It's actually simple, when you think about: Finding cancer earlier means you live longer knowing you have it.

    Consider an example: If John Smith died of cancer in 2010 and it was first diagnosed in 2006, he's not a five-year survivor. But say he had a PSA test in 2003 and a biopsy then detected cancer. He still dies in 2010 — but, bingo! Now he's a seven-year survivor!

    And that's exactly why the PSA test, biopsies and aggressive treatment are trumpeted as increasing five-year survival rates. The men do NOT live longer. They die at the same time they would have anyway. But the cancer is detected earlier and in the official records those men beat the five-year mark.

    When the USPFTF focused on ten-year survival rates, they exposed this bogus claim of success, and the PSA test was revealed to be almost worthless.

    The group advocates putting a halt to PSA screening tests unless a person "makes the personal decision that even a small possibility of benefit outweighs the known risk of harms."

    The panel said the best option would be to pursue better testing and treatment options. Clearly, what's needed most is a test to identify aggressive cancers and distinguish them from slow-growing cancers that — in men over 60 — could be left untreated. There's some action on this front, but no reliable test yet, as far as I know.
Watch the trend, some doctors say
    Supposedly there IS a way to get some good out of the PSA test — observe the trend over a series of tests. If you're tested every six months and the PSA score is trending up, some doctors say it indicates an aggressive cancer may be present. Biopsies and more aggressive treatment may be warranted.

    Quite a few urologists and oncologists are now working on this assumption, but I don't know how much evidence there is to support it. For what it's worth, I have a dog in this fight. My PSA number is slightly elevated and increased very slightly over the past year. I'm not alarmed, but I'll get tested again in six months and see if there's an uptrend.
10 Rules of Fat Loss
    It's called "watchful waiting" — and it's by far the most sensible strategy for most men who have a high PSA score and even for those who are told they have a tumor.

    Urologists and even general practitioners are reluctant to give up on the PSA test. They continue to use as if it means something. My guess is that most men middle-aged and up are still being regularly tested. "Do nothing" is not an appealing strategy to most people — and that includes patients, who are easily panicked into biopsies, and then into radiation or surgery, when a doctor starts throwing around the "C" word.

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

50 College Coaches on Twitter Can you say "Recruiting Tool?"


50 College Coaches You Should Follow on Twitter

In the world of college sports, Twitter is a divisive subject. Many coaches go so far as toban their players from using the social networking site for fear it will distract players or be used as a vehicle for trash talking. Then there's the ambivalent group, the coaches who don't block players from using Twitter, but will probably go to their graves without ever sending a tweet themselves. But some forward-thinking coaches have embraced Twitter as a way to connect with die-hard fans and give them news and info that can't be had anywhere else. These 50 are the ones who do that the best.
Basketball
  1. John Calipari:
    This three-time National Coach of the Year will keep you up to date with news from current and former players from the reigning Division I men's hoops championship team at University of Kentucky.
  2. Billy Donovan:
    More than 70,000 followers keep in touch with this successful head of the Florida Gators men's program, who tweets team news like updates on the all-important recruiting situation.
  3. Chris Collins:
    Collins is a former high school and college b-ball star and an up-and-coming associate head coach at Duke under the legendary Coach K. Keep an eye on this kid by following his Twitter feed.
  4. Seth Greenberg:
    Although he was recently let go after nine years as the head coach of Virginia Tech's men's basketball team, this 2005 ACC Coach of the Year will land on his feet. In the meantime, he's tweeting basketball wisdom from his years of experience.
  5. Scott Nagy:
    South Dakota State made a decent showing in March Madness this year, giving eventual Elite 8 team Baylor a run for their money. Coach Nagy runs a fun Twitter feed, but don't be surprised if he corrects your spelling.
  6. Bill Self:
    Every basketball season, there are a few usual suspects for who will make the Final Four. Kansas is one of those, so Coach Self's feed is a can't-miss.
  7. Scott Drew:
    Coach Drew has completely transformed Baylor men's basketball, taking them from a 1-15 team to a serious championship contender. He's got a lot to be happy about, and his positive tweets show it.
  8. Jim Carr:
    Longtime Rutgers coach Jim Carr recently took a job as an assistant coach at University of Rhode Island. He brings his reputation for wit and politeness to his Twitter feed.
  9. Gary Blair:
    He must be doing something right. Under Coach Blair's guidance, the Texas A&M women's basketball team won it all in 2011. He's your best source of women's hoops news from Aggieland.
  10. Marvin Menzies:
    His success at New Mexico State has had other schools trying to lure him away. For the near future, Coach Menzies goal is for the Aggies to improve on their disappointing first-round tournament exit in 2012.
  11. Kevin McGuff:
    @CoachMcGuff says the University of Washington has "some of the most intense women's basketball fans in the country." He tries to keep them informed with this Twitter feed.
  12. Steve Wojciechowski:
    This associate head coach at Duke is a serial tweeter, offering recruiting updates, inspiring quotes, and chats with Blue Devil hoops fans and former players-turned-pros.
  13. Pat Summitt:
    The famous "head coach emeritus" has recently begun tweeting again, keeping followers informed of Volunteer news and information about her foundation that deals with early-onset dementia.
  14. Tom Crean:
    After seeing success as Marquette's head coach, Crean inherited a struggling Indiana team in 2008 that he led to the Sweet Sixteen this year. Subscribing to his Twitter feed is a good way to keep tabs on this coach whose stock continues to rise.
  15. Cliff Warren:
    Jacksonville U head coach Cliff Warren provides a good variety of tweeted material, regular featuring uplifting quotes and stats from pastors, former coaches, and successful businesspeople, in addition to team and school updates.
  16. Chris Mack:
    Xavier is a solid postseason team led by Coach Mack and his excellent 50-17 record. But his Twitter feed proves he's not afraid to mix it up with fans or to share his thoughts on life as a husband and dad to two little girls.
  17. Jay Wright:
    Villanova hasn't made the NCAA tournament since 2008. They're always a team to watch and if Coach Wright keeps up the frenetic pace of his tweets come basketball season, this will be a feed to follow.
  18. Bacari Alexander:
    Assistant coach Alexander "strives to be a leader" for Michigan's men's basketball. His feed is a composite of positive quotes from A Godly Life, Inspirational Quotes, African Proverbs, and other Twitter feeds.
  19. Kim Mulkey:
    Mulkey's coaching no doubt had a lot to do with Baylor women's 40-0 2011-2012 season, the first ever in NCAA history. However, the possibility of sanctions looms. Stay tuned into this feed for news.
Football
  1. Lane Kiffin:
    Who knows what this polarizing USC head coach will take to Twitter to do next? Commit a recruiting violation? Wish Britney Spears happy birthday? The only way to find out is to follow along.
  2. Les Miles:
    Some consider Coach Miles' Twitter feed to be perfect. Follow the LSU head coach and decide for yourself.
  3. Lou Holtz:
    OK, technically he hasn't coached since 2004. But that year was Lou Holtz's 45th year of coaching in both college and the NFL, meaning the guy knows his stuff and is worth keeping up with.
  4. Mike Leach:
    He's been called a "bully" and a "certified nut job." Can Coach Leach get it together and return to his glory days coaching at a major program like Texas Tech? Find out here.
  5. Will Muschamp:
    In 2010, Muschamp took over at Florida from the winningest coach in SEC history, and things have gotten off to a rocky start. Follow along as he tries to restore the Gators to the high level of success they're used to.
  6. Daon Roberts:
    This WVU assistant coach has all the makings of an intriguing tweeter: Harvard-educated professor, connoisseur of catfish, and sweet tea sommelier. Check him out.
  7. Jim Mora:
    Former Atlanta Falcons and Seattle Seahawks coach Jim Mora just signed a five-year contract with UCLA. He's fired up to be coaching again and it will be interesting to see where he can take the Bruins.
  8. Steve Sarkisian:
    Coach Sark does a lot of work with Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure, and uses his Twitter feed to keep followers updated on it, in addition to news on his #21-ranked Huskies.
  9. Hugh Freeze:
    The Ole Miss head coach regularly posts encouraging tweets with the tag #wintheday, with a healthy dose of fishing trip pictures thrown in for good measure.
  10. Butch Jones:
    The 2011 Big East Coach of the Year keeps fans abreast of Cincinnati football developments. They're coming off a strong 2011 season capped by a bowl victory over Vanderbilt and look to maintain that momentum this year.
  11. David Shaw:
    You may have seen Coach Shaw working as a commentator for the NFL Network's coverage of the draft. His day job is coaching the Stanford football team (hopefully) back to a bowl game without Andrew Luck running the offense.
  12. Joker Phillips:
    Kentucky football may not enjoy the same success as the men's basketball team, but coach Joker Phillips keeps fan interest alive by regularly picking up the team, its achievements, and events on his Twitter feed.
  13. June Jones:
    Southern Methodist is looking to go out on a high note before it leaves Conference USA for the Big East. Follow along from recruitment to the post-season, if there is one, on Coach Jones' feed.
  14. Mike Gundy:
    Mike Gundy is the man who's turned Oklahoma State into a top-tier football program. Check up on his tweets for everything that's happening with the Cowboys.
  15. Bret Bielema:
    This coach led Wisconsin to a great 2011 season that included a Big Ten championship. Their recruiting for this year has been solid and their prospects for the 2012 season look like they'll make for some happy tweets.
  16. Kevin Sumlin:
    The former Houston head coach is looking to reverse the sagging fortunes of his new team, the Texas Aggies. You and the Aggie faithful can get your introduction to the new coach here.
  17. Jemal Singleton:
    OSU running backs coach @CoachSings provides a refreshing change to the priority schedule for many coaches. His bio proudly states it's "faith+family+football."
Baseball
  1. Mike Bianco:
    As of this writing, Ole Miss is safely into the NCAA tournament. Coach Bianco should be tweeting updates — like what movie they're watching on the bus — along the way.
  2. Billy Kennedy:
    This Texas A&M "bus driver" (school slang for coach) has the eighth-ranked Aggies in prime position for a run at a national title, so keep an eye on their progress from the coach's spot on the bench.
  3. Chad Holbrook:
    Check out the tweets from associate head coach Chad Holbrook as the South Carolina Gamecocks seek their third national championship in the last three years.
  4. Jim Morris:
    Miami has clenched a berth in the NCAA tournament, but they've been dealing with injuries late in the season. See if Coach Morris can lead them to a deep postseason run, and get the details here.
  5. Sunny Golloway:
    A strong late-season push should be enough to secure a tournament bid for the Sooners. Send your thoughts to coach Golloway as they make their run, or just enjoy his positive #keepfighting, #onepitchatatime, and #wineverypitch tags.
  6. Steve Smith:
    Baylor head coach Steve Smith invites you to "Follow to get his view from the dugout." It's a great time to be a sports fan at Baylor, and the baseball is no exception, so jump on the bandwagon.
  7. Tracy Smith:
    Indiana's head coach runs this feed that keeps fans connected with Hoosier stickball news, with some personal thoughts and major league baseball takes from Smith.
Other Sports
  1. Randy Waldrum:
    The Twitter feed for the head coach of the women's soccer team at Notre Dame is worth following on the strength of one funny tweet: "Just got locked in the bathroom @ ND for 45 minutes…had to be rescued through the ceiling!"
  2. Nikki Izzo-Brown:
    West Virginia women's soccer had a solid 10-4 season last year. Coach Izzo-Brown will keep you connected with the team's schedule, as well as her interest in the fight against breast cancer.
  3. Rico Blasi:
    He's the most successful hockey coach in Miami University's history. Follow Coach Blasi as Miami gears up to take to the ice this fall.
  4. Tom Anastos:
    Michigan State hockey currently holds a solid pre-season ranking of 15th in the country. As training heats up, this is the feed to follow for all your Spartan rink news.
  5. Patrick Murphy:
    Alabama's softball team holds the #2 spot in the nation's rankings right now. If you want to know something about their coach before the NCAA tourney starts, this is the place to look.
  6. Stacey Nuveman Deniz:
    Somehow this former gold-medal Olympian finds time in between coaching softball at San Diego State and raising a "bouncing baby boy" to keep her followers up to speed on her life.
  7. Rhonda Revelle:
    Nebraska softball head coach Revelle alternates her tweets between inspiring quotes and news from around the Cornhusker baseball and softball diamonds.
June 19th, 2012 written by 

Monday, June 18, 2012

Renfroe Homers Twice but Big Train Fall to Redbirds on Fathers Day


Renfroe Homers Twice but Big Train
Fall to Redbirds on Fathers Day
Renfroe3
This Hunter Renfroe swing drove his first home run from Povich Field.
While the Big Train were unable to increase their win total on Fathers Day, they were able to welcome back a star.

Hunter Renfore (Mississippi State) starred on last season's National Championship Big Train squad and returned to Bethesda again this season. While he had begun his second season at a decent pace, many expected bigger things. Renfroe's bat agreed with that sentiment on Sunday night as he book-ended the Big Train attack with two-run homers in both the first and the ninth innings.

Unfortunately for the Big Train, that was all the offense on the night and team lost 6-4 to the Baltimore Redbirds.

Despite the loss, the atmosphere at Povich Field was great on a wonderful Fathers Day evening as dads came out with their kids to play catch in the outfield before the game, get a free hat courtesy of First Call Office Products, and settle in for a night of great baseball.

The box score and play-by-play of the game can be found here.

Death in a soda can (and it's not just the sugar!)




An Everyday Cause of Cancer
You Can and Should Avoid


    A friend of mine recently learned her husband has early stage cancer. Praise God, it's treatable and he'll probably be all right.


    We got to talking about how it might have happened. What on earth could have caused it? We're all exposed to so many toxic substances. Today I'm going to talk about just one that might have had some role in this man's misfortune. There's no way to know for sure, but it's one of the most common, widespread carcinogens in America.


    It's yet another poison you don't need and can easily avoid. Keep reading for the details...


Continued below. . .



Drink This and Cancer
Comes Pouring Out of Your Body

    "If I could pick only one treatment to cure my cancer, this would be it," says a top expert on alternative cancer treatments.


    Research conducted by a scientist at the Detroit Institute of Cancer Research showed this is one of the world's most powerful cancer cures. Even the mainstream National Cancer Institute confirmed that this do-it-yourself treatment kills cancer cells. Then they buried the research.


    Personally, I've been writing about cancer treatments for almost seven years. Out of nearly 400 that I've investigated, I haven't found an at-home treatment that's better.


    It worked for Robert, age 54, who had late stage stomach cancer. His doctors told him he didn't have chance. The most they could do was buy him a little time, using four aggressive chemotherapy drugs PLUS radiation — a deadly, toxic, last-ditch treatment.


    INSTEAD Robert used this non-toxic liquid and was completely cancer-free within months. The amazed doctor was forced to admit Robert's cancer was "in remission." Two years later, he was still cancer-free.


    Click here and watch an important video presentation about this discovery.
   
10 Rules of Fat Loss
 It's the ultimate irony...
    For several decades, the U.S. government has blessed the widespread sale and use of a known carcinogen—ignoring scores of studies proving it damages our health.


    Scientists now believe the poster child for "safe" packaging chemicals may be making one of their best cancer treatments useless!


    I'm talking about bisphenol-A, called BPA for short. This polycarbonate is used to harden plastics and is found in everything from CDs and dental fillings to sunglasses. It's used as a protective lining in metals cans, such as soda cans. It's found in nearly all plastic drink containers.


    Long-time readers might remember an earlier article (Issue #17) where I warned that BPA is found in the urine of 95% of Americans—including that of innocent babies! That article went into great detail on the abundant evidence against the use of BPA.


    I also reported that many scientists are concerned about BPA. Levels in humans are well above those known to cause adverse effects in lab animals.


    And yet as recently as March 2012, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is still insisting "the scientific evidence at this time does not suggest that very low levels of human exposure to BPA through the diet are unsafe."1


    Baloney!


    Government organizations and the medical establishment have known since the 1890s that BPA acts as a synthetic form of the hormone estrogen. And there's a great deal of evidence that over-exposure to estrogens in our food and environment is a major source of health problems…


    When a team of University of Cincinnati scientists exposed human breast cancer cells to low levels of BPA, they were shocked to find that BPA acts on cancer cells in much the same way that estrogen does.


    But wait, this gets even worse. BPA encouraged the production of proteins that prevent cancer cells from being killed by chemotherapy drugs, according to cell biologist and lead study author Nira Ben-Jonathan, PhD.


    So according to the study's results, not only does BPA contribute to cancer formation—it undermines and neutralizes mainstream medicine's favorite way of treating cancer!


    The study's authors said "these data provide considerable support to the accumulating evidence that BPA is hazardous to human health."2


    And despite the FDA's 'defend and deny' strategy—many folks are waking up to the warnings and taking decisive action...

Canada says "NO" to cancerous BPA!

    While many federal government agencies in the U.S. continue to express only mild concern about the possibility that BPA is a dangerous carcinogen, folks in other countries are taking a far more hard-nosed approach.


    Canada has always been in the vanguard when it comes to cracking down on BPA use. After first taking steps in 2008 to control use of this toxic chemical, Canada became the first nation in the world to ban it altogether in 2010.


    And Canada may be setting a trend for many other nations around the globe…


    Despite significant industry pressure, the European Union banned BPA use in baby bottles as of June 2011. And the French National Assembly went a step further—declaring BPA to be banned from ALL food packaging by 2014.


    Prompted by consumer concerns about BPA toxins in the food supply, Japanese industries took swift action to voluntarily reduce the use of BPA between 1998 and 2003.


    So what did they do? Their two approaches included:
  1. Changing inner can linings from a paint containing BPA to a PET film laminate, and/or
  2. Using an EXR paint with much less BPA migration into food.
    A follow-up examination of canned foods and beverages in Japan revealed virtually noBPA in these items!

    China and Malaysia have also jumped on the 'ban BPA' bandwagon—announcing plans in 2011 to bar its use in baby bottles and other food and drink packaging for children.

    So who cares if the rest of the world wants to change their food packaging! In the U.S. of A.—we're gonna do it another way...
FDA favors a "watchful waiting" approach
    According to the FDA, you needn't be overly concerned about getting excessive BPA through food. They insist that both children and adults are able to rapidly metabolize and eliminate the 'trace amounts' of chemical ingested.

    But because environmental groups, health care professionals and other pests… er, uh… concerned persons keep making this an issue—the agency said it plans to continue researching the chemical and review study results carefully.

    Because of its pro-BPA stance, the agency only recently responded to the 2008 petition from the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) to ban BPA from products manufactured in the United States.

    And the NRDC had to sue the administration to get a response!

    Dr. Sarah Janssen, senior scientist in the public health program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said the FDA has "failed to protect our health and safety" and is "out-of-step with scientific and medical research."

    Meanwhile, 11 states have refused to wait another moment. In October 2011, California became the latest state to ban BPA from baby bottles and children's sippy cups.

    What's more, some U.S. manufacturers have begun voluntarily removing BPA from can linings. But it is still legal to use BPA in all food packaging, so we're not out of the woods just yet...

    As Japan has clearly shown, it IS possible to manufacture packaging without BPA. But it seems the FDA is being strong-armed by companies with a vested interest in keeping BPA on the market.

    In the words of NRDC scientist Dr. Janssen, the FDA's lack of regulatory action "illustrates the need for a major overhaul of how the government protects us against dangerous chemicals." The FDA is quite aggressive about banning food supplements based on minimal or no evidence of hazard.

    Meanwhile, it permits substances like BPA that are proven toxic by a mountain of evidence — apparently because these substances are manufactured by powerful industries. The agency's conduct is repulsive and disgusting. As I've said many times before, the regulatory state actually puts us all in greater danger because it creates the illusion that someone else is taking care of you. Don't believe it. You have to inform yourself and take action to protect yourself and those you love.

    Our last issue suggested one easy and delicious way to do that — one of my favorite foods. If you missed the article, just scroll down and read it now.