US Sports Net Today!


Live Play-by-Play, Updates, Highlights and More! on US Sports Network!
[Chrome Users-You may have to click on the play button twice to listen]
US Sports Network Powered By Beast Sports Nutrition!




US Sports Radio
The Las Vegas Raiders Play Here
Fitness and Sports Performance Info You Can Use!
The Scoreboard Mall
The Rock Almighty Shaker Of Heaven And Earth!
The Coolest Links In The Universe!

Sunday, January 13, 2013

The NFL Combine Workout Week 2 Day 5


                                         
Welcome to the US Sports Online NFL Combine Workout! If this is your first time using the US Sports Online NFL Combine Workout, then please go at your own pace. You may lower the volume, to allow your body to become conditioned to these more challenging workouts. In other words: "Challenge by choice" Lets get a handle on the goals and objectives of what we want to accomplish for this 12 week training cycle:
The NFL Combine Workout
This is it! Here is the 12-Week (NFL Combine) Off-Season Football Strength and Power Programs! The off-season is the best time of the year for making great improvements. It is the time to develop your strength, power, quickness and conditioning. Those of you who have played football know what needs to be done to get yourself into the kind of shape it takes to be a dominant player. And, if you are new to a football program, just follow the workouts and see great results!
Strength and power are two of the most important physical qualities that a football player can have. These Off-Season Football Programs are specifically designed to improve these qualities. There will be an evolution in these programs from a base strength phase through to a peak power phase. Remember to keep a positive attitude and work hard!
Get jacked and ready as a team. Forward this email to your team mates and work together on a championship run!
Be sure to stay hydrated before, during, and after your workouts.
 This program can be applicable for conditioning for any sport. This is a 5 day a week program you will receive workouts every Monday-Friday. Speed, agility, quickness, and endurance programs can compliment and complete your preparation for the upcoming season. You can purchase an easy to follow speed agility and quickness program from US Sports Strength and Conditioning for a one time payment of only $10 by clicking here
To get a Strength and Conditioning program designed especially for you  Click Here 
*The weights and intensities listed were originally programmed for a specific athlete. Adjust the weights as you see fit and have SAFETY FIRST in mind.
Equipment needed:  Power Gym, Machines, 
  
 
Week 2 - Day 5 (Friday) of US Sports Strength & Conditioning NFL Combine Workout's ProgramWeek Difficulty:Hard
  View Printer Friendly Version

Click on an Exercise Name to view a description of that exercise
SelectExercise NameSet and Rep Combinations
1
 
Warmup and Stretch
8 minutes 
2
   Video
Squat
10 reps @ 270 lbs,5 reps @ 325 lbs,
3 reps @ 380 lbs,6 reps @ 435 lbs,
6 reps @ 435 lbs,6 reps @ 435 lbs,
8 reps @ 325 lbs  
3
   Video
Dumbbell Walk Lunge
5 reps @ 50 lbs,6 reps @ 65 lbs,
6 reps @ 65 lbs,7 reps @ 65 lbs 
4
   Video
Machine Leg Curl
10 reps @ 160 lbs,8 reps @ 175 lbs,
8 reps @ 160 lbs  
5
   Video
Stretch Deadlifts
10 reps @ 195 lbs,8 reps @ 210 lbs,
8 reps @ 195 lbs  
6
   Video
Cable Standing Reverse Curl
10 reps @ 90 lbs,8 reps @ 95 lbs,
8 reps @ 90 lbs  
7
   Video
Cable Preacher Curl
10 reps @ 105 lbs,8 reps @ 110 lbs,
8 reps @ 105 lbs  
8
   Video
Med Ball Side Throw (kneeling)
15 reps,12 reps,
10 reps  
9
   Video
Bent Leg Knee Ups from Bench
27 reps,27 reps,
21 reps  
10
   Video
Alternate Heel Touchers
54 reps,54 reps,
42 reps  

  
 
 
Be sure to cool down and stretch after each workout.                                                                 
                              Great Job! See You Next Monday!                

Your workout program is ready! Choose your program goal below and get your customized workout, nutrition, and lifestyle plan in a matter of minutes all for just 66 cents per day!
Step 1: choose (click on) your program goal:
General Fitness Workouts
General Fitness Programs are designed for overall health and the achievement of a leaner, stronger bo...
Strength and Power Workouts
The Strength and Power Programs were designed to maximize the body's ability to generate strength. T...
Get Lean Workouts
The Get Lean Programs were designed to have higher repetitions. This higher volume causes a greater ...
Sports Specific Workouts
The Sports Specific Programs are designed to give people an exercise program tailored to the demands ...
Home Based Workouts
The Home Workout Programs are great for those who wish to train in the privacy of their own home with...
Youth Strength Training
Youth Strength Training Programs are designed for overall health and the achievement of a leaner, str...
Custom Favorites!
These Custom Programs have been developed in response to special needs and requests. Some of the pr...
Women's Fitness
The Women's Fitness Programs are designed to bring about a toning and shaping effect to the body by u...
Body Building
The Body Building Programs were developed with the concepts and knowledge of cutting edge training pr...
Armed Forces PFT Programs
These Armed Forces PFT Programs will get you prepared for the PFT test. There are also running progr...
Track and Field
The Track and Field Programs will work the body to increase strength and power. These key elements a...
Custom General Fitness Programs
There are a wide variety of Custom Programs within this section There are Upper Body Only Programs, ...
Metabolism Booster Workouts
The Metabolism Booster Programs were designed to create an elevated caloric burning rate both during ...
Cardiovascular Workouts
These are "Cardio Only" Programs for those who want to focus exclusively on aerobic fitness. Just pe...
Back To The Basics Series
The Back To The Basics Series of Workout Pograms incorporate many different program goals. The major...
*Please consult a physician before engaging in any exercise program. It is highly recommended to have a good foundation of previous weight lifting experience before engagning in the NFL Combine Workout. US Sports Strength and Conditioning assumes no liability if injury or ailment should occur due to your engagement of this program or any of the US Sports Strength and Conditioning  Online or in-person Workouts.
icon

SHAW NIPS BULLDOGS ON LATE THREE TO SQUEEZE OUT 92-90 VICTORY OVER BOWIE STATE



RALEIGH, N.C. - With two seconds showing on the clock, Shaw University's Latrail McCoy launched a three from the left wing, draining it and giving the Bears a 92-90 victory over Bowie State.

Bowie State senior Byron Westmorland (Baltimore, MD.) led the Bulldogs with team-highs of 23 points and six rebounds. Senior Najee White (Jamaica Queens, N.Y.) finished with 19 points, junior Ray Gatling (Oxon Hill, Md.) added 17 points and senior Byron Wilson (Upper Marlboro, Md.) chipped in 11 points.

The Shaw win came despite the collapse of a 19-point lead with less than 14 minutes remaining on the clock.  The Bears committed ten turnovers in those last 14 minutes, while also missing five of six free throws - two of those the front end of one-and-ones. 

“Even though we came up short tonight, we did a better job taking care of the ball … However we didn’t do a good job on the glass”, said BSU head coach Darrell Brooks.  When asked about overcoming a large deficit, Brooks responded, “We don’t want any more moral victories, but I think we’re so close as a team to really playing to our full potential.”

Bowie State triggered their comeback when they switched to a stifling full-court press that seemed to lead to the Shaw miscues.

Curtis Hines again led the Bears, this time with 29 points on a 10-for-15 shooting performance, including six for 11 from the three-point line. McCoy put up only one shot in the first half - which he missed - but had dished out four assists by the intermission.  All of his 15 points came in the second half, eight of them in the final 2:05.
  
Shaw broke on top early in the game, building a 15-8 lead with 15:16 left in the first when Taurus Dortch hit a three. 

Two minutes later, a White jumper in the lane for Bowie State cut the Shaw lead to only three at 18-15.

For much of the rest of the half, the Shaw lead hovered at or about five points, with Bowie State able to get no closer than three, but Shaw was unable to build a lead of more than six.

With 5:44 left in the half, Hines drained a three to finally push the Bears to an eight-point advantage, 34-26.  Bowie State would again cut the lead to only five on a three pointer from senior Dameatric Scott (Hagerstown, Md). 

For three and a half minutes, Shaw went on a 12-4 run to build a 13-point lead when Hines drained a three from the left corner off a pass from Karron Johnson.  Bowie State would cut the lead to 12 by the half, when Shaw went to the locker room with a 49-37 lead.

The two teams battled evenly in the first few minutes of the second half.  With 15:10 showing on the clock, junior Trawn Rogers (Baltimore, Md.) hit a layup for Bowie State to trim the Shaw lead to ten at 58-48. 

Hines answered with a three, triggering a nine-point Shaw run that concluded with a layup from Hines on the fastbreak to give Shaw a 67-48 lead with 13:39 left to play.

Bowie State slowly chipped away at the lead for the next three minutes.  With 10:55 remaining, Hines slammed home a dunk that gave Shaw a 74-59 lead.

The Bulldogs answered with a 9-3 run, concluding with a three from Westmorland to trim the lead under double digits at 77-68. 

While Karron Johnson had a dunk for Shaw to take the lead back over ten, Bowie State answered with a 13-3 run, ending with a layup from Wilson to cut the Shaw lead to only one, 82-81 with 4:02 left.

Johnson had another dunk off an assist by McCoy, but Gatling hit a pair of free throws to again put Bowie State within a bucket with 3:32 left. 

Neither team scored for a minute, but with 2:26 left in the game, White hit a layup to give Bowie State their first lead since the opening minutes of the game at 85-84.

McCoy responded immediately with a three to give the Bears a two-point margin.  Scott answered for the Bulldogs with a three of his own.

It was McCoy's turn to reclaim the lead, which he did on a layup, making the score 89-88 for Shaw with 1:33 left in the game.

Both teams fell silent for another minute until Gatling hit a layup with just under 12 seconds left, setting the stage for McCoy's final bucket which gave the Bears the lead with 2.1 seconds left.  Wilson launched a shot just over mid-court as the buzzer sounded, but it bounced off the rim, giving Shaw the final 92-90 win.

Four Bears finished with double-digit point totals.  In addition to Hines' 29, Dortch had 15, Johnson 14 and McCoy 13 - all scored in the second half.  Johnson had a double-double, adding 12 rebounds to his 14 points.  Hines and McCoy led the Bears with five assists apiece, while Derrick Hunter finished with eight points and four steals.

Bowie State will look to get back into the win column on Monday (January 14th) on the road against Fayetteville State. The Bulldogs and Broncos are set to get underway at 7:30 pm in FSU’s Capel Arena.

Bowie State Men's Basketball vs. Fayetteville State (1/14/2013)


Attached are the Bowie State at Fayetteville State men's basketball notes for Monday(1/14). The Bulldogs and Broncos will tip-off at 7:30 pm in FSU's Capel Arena.
 
Follow the game via live stats at

Bowie State Women's Basketball vs. Fayetteville State (1/14/13)


Attached are the Bowie State at Fayetteville State women's basketball notes for Monday (1/14). The Lady Bulldogs and Lady Broncos will tip-off at 5:30 pm in FSU's Capel Arena.
 
Follow the game via live stats at

The diabetes-cancer connection

Cancer Defeated Publications
Web Version Subscribe | Back Issues | Resource Center | Feedback
About Cancer Defeated!

Why Do Diabetics Have an Increased
Risk of Cancer?
What Your Doctor May Not Have Told You…


    If you have diabetes, you already have enough problems on your plate. I don't want to add to them. But I'm sorry to say that two of the most common diseases in the United States — cancer and diabetes — share a stronger link than you might realize. The evidence is piling up like crazy.

    I'm not surprised. In our research at Cancer Defeated we've seen for a long time that a diet high in sugar and other refined carbs is an underlying cause of both diseases.

    We get news and tips from a large number of cancer patients and cancer survivors, and we find that when patients make the lifestyle changes needed to get rid of cancer they often get rid of diabetes while they're at it. (Sometimes they get rid of arthritis, too.) You can kill two or even three birds with one stone. Here's why. . .

Continued below. . .

Breast Cancer Survivor was told:
"You'll be dead in a year" (Pssst!! That was 12 years ago!)
    Doctors didn't give Wiltrude much hope when they diagnosed her with cancer in the year 2000. Wiltrude, a German psychologist, never thought cancer would happen to her. But it did. And it came as a big shock.

    One doctor told her, "You'll be dead in a year." Late stage breast cancer isvirtually incurable using conventional treatments. Even M.D.s admit it. They talk about "buying you more time." (Don't count on it. The evidence shows you're better off doing nothing than chemo.)

    When Wiltrude told her doctor she was going to try alternative treatments, he said, "You are committing suicide with what you're doing." But she was determined to find a way to beat her cancer.

    Thanks to the wonders of the Internet, this European woman came across a book by my good friend Bill Henderson, one of the smartest and wisest people I know when it comes to cancer treatment.

    She tried Bill's top, number one recommendation — a gentle treatment you can do at home for just $5.15 a day. What's more, the cost goes down to $3.50 after six weeks because you just need a maintenance dose. And it even tastes good.

    Not only has Wiltrude passed the five-year cancer survival mark, she's survived for 12 years. We just interviewed her recently for this publication. The radiologist who tests her every year told her, "You're the only one with this kind of result."

    You can find out about Bill’s proven cancer treatment plan in a free video presentation — click here to watch it now.

    When I ask him about some of the treatments that top alternative doctors use, Bill sort of shrugs and says, "They're fine, but why bother? My treatment works, you can do it yourself, and it costs practically nothing."

    He's coached thousands of cancer patients with all different types and stages of cancer. Most of the people who follow the detailed, specific plan in this Special Report get over their cancer and live for years.

    "Almost any kind of cancer is reversible," says Bill. "I never give up on anyone."

Click here and watch the free video presentation about Bill’s amazing cancer protocol.


    Instead of relying only on what we hear from cancer patients, I asked one of my associate editors, Carol Parks, to see what kind of stats and studies she could find on the cancer-diabetes connection. She found a lot of research that shows your risk of cancer goes up if you have diabetes.

    In the words of Frederick Brancati, M.D., professor of medicine and epidemiology at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, "It's something that is hiding in plain sight. Diabetes is very common, cancer is very common, but no one had really thought to organize the literature and see it."1

    Researchers are now connecting the dots between the two diseases. Specifically, scientists are analyzing all the available research from multiple well-designed studies — called a meta-analysis. This approach can highlight problems that a single study might miss.

    The evidence has become so compelling that the American Diabetes Association and the American Cancer Society held a consensus conference in 2009 — exploring the association between diabetes and cancer incidence, the risk factors common to both, and the causes of both. The consensus report is published in the July/August, 2010 issue of CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.

    Findings from recent studies include:
  • Japanese study: Showed adults with diabetes to be at increased risk of developing several kinds of cancer… increased liver, kidney, and pancreatic cancers for men, and stomach and liver cancers for women… compared to those without diabetes.2
  • University of Minnesota School of Public Health and University of Minnesota Cancer Center: Found women with diabetes were 1.5 times more likely to develop colorectal cancer than women without diabetes.

    Assisted by colleagues, Dr. Andrew Flood, Assistant Professor in the Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, examined the records of 45,000 participants from a large study called the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.

    They chose participants with no history of colorectal cancer or diabetes at the beginning of the study, and focused on the ones who got colorectal cancer later on.

    Flood and colleagues found that women with diabetes had the greatest risk of developing colorectal cancer. "These results remained statistically significant even after controlling for all known and suspected confounding variables," stated Flood.3
  • Health, Eating, Activity and Lifestyle (HEAL) Study: Women with invasive breast cancer and elevated blood levels of C-peptide, a marker of insulin secretion, had a three-times-greater risk of death than women with lower C-peptide levels.

    Researchers followed 689 women without type 2 diabetes for 9 years. They took regular fasting blood samples and other measurements like weight, height, age and lifestyle factors… and analyzed the link between C-peptide and risk of death, adjusting for other factors.

    They found the risk of death to be three times higher in the highest C-peptide group compared to the lowest C-peptide group.4
  • South Korea: A study of more than one million South Koreans suggests diabetes can raise the risk of developing — and dying from — several kinds of cancer. The highest risks were found in people with the highest blood sugar levels, says the study, which was reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

    Researchers analyzed data on 1.29 million South Koreans ages 30-95 through a health insurance group covering government employees, teachers and their families. The study followed participants for up to 10 years, beginning in 1992.

    Those with diabetes were 30% more likely to develop and die from cancer than those who were diabetes-free. Pancreatic cancer showed the closest association with diabetes. This is no surprise, since the pancreas makes insulin. But diabetics were also at higher risk of liver, esophagus and colon cancer.5
  • Johns Hopkins: Brancati (quoted above) and colleagues analyzed research from 23 studies looking at cancer patients who already had diabetes at the time they were diagnosed with cancer. They discovered that those with diabetes had a 1.4 times greater risk of dying from cancer than patients with no blood sugar problems. Mortality was statistically higher for breast, endometrial, and colorectal cancers.6
    Overall, the risks from diabetes are greatest — twice as high, or more — for cancers of the liver, pancreas, and endometrium compared to people who aren't diabetic. And the risks are approximately 1.2 to 1.5 times higher for colorectal, breast, and bladder cancer.

    Lung cancer doesn't appear to be linked to diabetes. Prostate cancer is the only type of cancer found to be lower in diabetics. I don't recommend becoming diabetic to protect yourself against prostate cancer.

    Most of the news appears to be bad for those with diabetes.

    But stick with me for a few minutes, because there is a light at the end of the tunnel...
Some Quick Background about Diabetes
    If you want to understand the search for the link between the two diseases, then start with a basic understanding of diabetes, and how it affects your body.

    Diabetes is divided into two major types — called type 1 and type 2.

    Few studies to date have explored cancer links to type 1 diabetes, so we'll focus on type 2 here. Type 2 is often called "adult onset diabetes" although these days it affects younger and younger people. This is the form of diabetes we bring on ourselves with a bad diet.

    Whenever you eat any type of carbohydrate — whether bread, pasta, cereal, potatoes, rice, fruit, dessert, candy, soda, ice cream — it's converted to a simple sugar known as glucose.

    It's true that glucose is a fuel your body needs, but it's toxic in excess — unless it's being burned inside your cells.

    To get it out of your bloodstream and into your cells quickly, specialized beta cells in your pancreas sense an abundance of glucose in your bloodstream after you eat a meal. That's your body's way of telling your pancreas to release insulin, a hormone that allows glucose to be admitted into muscle and liver cells. As I mentioned, it's urgent to get glucose out of your blood.

    But if your liver and muscle cells are already filled with glycogen, the product of metabolizing glucose, then your cells' "receptor sites" become resistant to the insulin. The receptor sites then decrease both in number and efficiency (called "down regulation").

    When your cells become insensitive to insulin, the sugar (glucose) stays in your bloodstream. To put it bluntly, your cells become so stuffed full of sugar they can't take in anymore. The pancreas still knows there's too much toxic glucose in your blood, so it frantically pumps out even more insulin, trying to get your cells to take in all the glucose. But this merely causes the receptors to become even more resistant. This is a bad thing, as excess insulin is also toxic. You've now got TWO toxins circulating in your blood: excess insulin and excess glucose.

    If you read much health information, you already know all this as "insulin resistance syndrome".

    Eventually, the insulin ushers the excess glucose into your fat cells, where it's stored as fat.

    The whole process is very bad news, wreaking havoc over time:
  • Because blood glucose is chronically too high, it becomes like sludge in your bloodstream and contributes to heart disease. It clogs arteries, binding with proteins to form harmful advanced glycated end-products (AGEs) which then cause inflammation throughout your body.
  • Your body begins to store more fat. Your muscles get less glycogen, and insulin inhibits the fat-burning enzyme lipase — so now you can't even burn stored fat as easily.
  • Excess insulin in your bloodstream causes plaque build-up in your arteries — which is why heart disease is so common in diabetics. It's not widely known, but most diabetics actually die of a heart attack after enough time goes by. They don't die directly from diabetes but from one of its side effects.
  • Excess insulin also increases cellular proliferation in cancers. In other words, it causes cancer to grow.
  • Insulin resistance not only prevents sugar from entering muscle cells — it also prevents amino acids from getting in. Amino acids are the building blocks of protein. Now you can't build or maintain your muscles either.
  • While your bloodstream is clogged with glucose, other parts of your body are actually starved for it, because they can't metabolize it properly anymore. So they start cannibalizing precious muscle tissue to make more sugar. Meaning, you get fatter and lose more muscle.
  • Your energy level nosedives, making you hungry for carbs and less willing to exercise. Definitely self-defeating.
  • Your liver becomes insulin resistant and cannot convert thyroid hormone T4 to T3, so you get thyroid problems which make your metabolism even more sluggish. You find yourself feeling tired all the time.
  • Excess sugar destroys nerve tissue, and you develop retinopathy and lose your eyesight.
  • Eventually your pancreas becomes so exhausted, it can't make more insulin and you have to inject insulin to stay alive.
Now for the GOOD news on diabetes...
    You can influence insulin sensitivity in two major ways!

    Hear me out here... this is true life-saving information.

    Exercise. Exercise plays a major role in improving insulin sensitivity. Your muscles burn stored glycogen as fuel during and after your workout. Exercised muscles desperately need glucose inside and will "up regulate" insulin receptors to speed up the process.

    What kind of exercise should you do? Resistance training is just as effective as aerobic activity, but a combo is best.

    If you exercise, your cells become "insulin sensitive" again — i.e. willing to respond when insulin "orders" them to open up to glucose. You won't require as much insulin to store any excess glucose… and that in turn "up regulates" the fat-burning enzymes… and you burn stored fats at a faster rate. Amino acids and vital nutrients gain entry to your cells, so you build more muscle and lose fat. What's not to like about that?

    Diet. Cut back on the carbs, especially the obvious sugars and refined foods. Make vegetables the base of your food pyramid, regardless of what the U.S. government says. It borders on the criminal for the government to suggest 60% of your calories should come from carbs. A high intake of refined, sugary foods is enormously stressful to your body.

    What's more, after 21 days or so on your new diet, you'll quit craving those refined carbs, as your body becomes accustomed to the new, healthier foods.
In Search of the Hidden Reason
for the Diabetes-Cancer Link...
    Researchers say there are many possible reasons for a link between diabetes and cancer, and for the higher risk that diabetics have of dying of cancer once they get it.

    One big question is whether the association between diabetes and cancer risk is mostly due to shared risk factors, or whether diabetes itself — and the changes it makes in your body -- directly cause cancer.

    In other words, does bad diet lead to diabetes which then leads to cancer, or does bad diet independently cause both at the same time? The mainstream doctors who conduct these studies might not put it that way, but I would. They like to speak of "risk factors" — they'll say "these two things are associated. . .they're found together." They don't like to say, "X causes cancer."

    Researchers are looking into factors like these. . .
  • Common risk factors, such as obesity, poor diet, physical inactivity and aging. Obesity is one of the highest risk factors for type 2 diabetes, and also a well-established risk factor for some cancers — especially cancers of the colon, endometrium (inner lining of the uterus), breast, kidney and esophagus.

    However, in the South Korean study, diabetes was associated with higher mortality rates from cancer even though few study participants were overweight. In addition, other studies suggest that weight alone may not be the reason for an increase in death among diabetes patients.
  • Diabetics are more susceptible to infections, increasing the risk of death following surgery and other treatments.
  • People with diabetes are at increased risk of other health problems, like kidney and heart disease. Doctors become reluctant to administer treatments to patients who are too ill and weak to handle them.
  • Doctors may fail to spot cancer in diabetic patients, due to a focus on their other diabetes-related problems.
  • The most plausible possibility may be that high insulin levels create an environment conducive to cancer growth.

    Dr. Edward Giovannucci, professor of nutrition and epidemiology at Harvard School of Public Health, notes that insulin and insulin-like growth factors (IGF) can promote some cancers. Also, many people with type 2 diabetes have high levels of circulating insulin, quite possibly for years before they're diagnosed with diabetes.

    The majority of cancer cells express insulin and IGF-1 receptors. In addition to metabolic functions, the insulin receptor is also capable of stimulating cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. Insulin and IGF may also be able to stimulate normal cells involved in cancer progression.7

    Lead author of the South Korean study, Sun Ha Jee, a public health researcher at Yonsei University in Seoul, said, "Insulin may influence cell growth. Cancer is characterized by runaway cell growth."

    In the HEAL Study, researchers found a correlation between C-peptide levels and higher death rates. Dr. Melinda L. Irwin, assistant professor at Yale University School of Public Health, noted that "C-peptide and most likely insulin, in and of itself, is a marker for breast cancer prognosis."8

    Irwin suggested, "The simple message is that breast cancer patients should take proven steps to lower their blood insulin levels, including exercise and eating a diet rich in fruits and vegetables…"
  • Giovannucci and colleagues stress that it's important to also look at glucose as a potential cancer mediator, given the dependence of many cancers on glucose for energy. As I've pointed out before in this newsletter, cancer lives on sugar. It's astounding that conventional oncologists often tell cancer patients, "Diet makes no difference at all to cancer treatment. Eat whatever you want." Mainstream medicine should consider the possibility that chronic high blood sugar facilitates cancer growth.9
    American Diabetes Association president Larry Deeb, MD, told WebMD that these recent findings add to the evidence that those who lower their risk of type 2 diabetes, or control the disease if they already have it, may also reduce their cancer risk.

    That means you need to:
  • Maintain a healthy body weight.
  • Get active for at least 30 minutes every day. Take your dog or child for a walk — you'll all benefit.
  • Eat a mostly raw, plant-based diet that's healthy and varied.
    Says Alice Bender, nutrition communications manager for the American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR), "At least for cancer, we know that each factor (above) independently lowers the risk of certain cancers, but all three done together are even more powerful. And, I suspect that's the case for preventing type 2 diabetes also."10

    Of course, it's also a good idea to limit alcohol consumption to one drink per day for women and two drinks per day for men. And don't smoke. 
Cancer Defeated Publications

Saturday, January 12, 2013

BULLDOGS BLOW PAST SAINT AUGUSTINE’S 90-72


BULLDOGS BLOW PAST SAINT AUGUSTINE’S 90-72


RALEIGH, N.C. - The Bulldogs rolled out to an 11-point halftime lead and cruised to a 90-72 road victory against the Falcons of Saint Augustine's University. With the win, Bowie State pulls even at 2-2 in the CIAA and sets their season record at 6-7.

BSU senior Byron Westmorland paced both teams with a game-high 18 points and junior Ray Gatling added 16 points and tied his season-high of seven assists. Five other Bulldogs scored in double figures with senior Najee White recording his fifth double-double of the season (13 points and tied his career-high in rebounds with 16. Seniors Dameatric Scott and Bryan Wilson recorded 12 points each and junior Carlos Smith added 10 points and two blocked shots.

The Bulldogs led from beginning to end and out-rebounded the Falcons 49-34. Smith began the game with a dunk and Westmorland followed with a 3-pointer to take an early 5-0 lead. Bowie State used an 8-0 run to seize a 25-14 advantage with less than 10 minutes remaining in the first half.

The Falcons did battle back to pull within two, using an 11-2 run following a traditional 3-point play by Tyquan Stroman at the 5:46 mark.

A third, first half dunk by Bowie State’s Smith pushed the Bulldogs lead back up to double digits at 43-22 with 54 seconds left in the opening period and that’s where the scored stayed heading into intermission.

The Falcons trimmed the Bulldogs lead to 48-43 early in the second half only to have Bowie State Wilson triple push the lead back to 10 at 62-52.

A 22-11 burst by the Bulldogs over the final 7:15 of the game was all the visitors needed to seal the lopsided victory.

 The Bulldogs ended the evening shooting 30-of-64 from the field (46.9 percent), which included 7-of-19 behind the 3-point line (36.8 percent) and 23-of-31 from the charity stripe (74.2 percent).

The Falcons finished with a 39.4 field goal percentage (26-of-66), 3-of-25 beyond the 3-point line (0-of-9 in the second half) and made 17-of-27 free throws (63.0 percent).

Saint Augustine’s (9-5 / 2-2 CIAA) was led by Stroman with 15 points and Joel Kinard along with Percy Woods finished the very physical contest with 12 and 11 points respectively. Chris Johnson fell just short of a Falcons double-double, adding nine points and a team-high eight rebounds.

Bowie State will be back in action on Saturday (January 10th) at Shaw University. Tip-time for the Bulldogs and Bears is 4 pm.

LADY BULLDOGS SUFFER 71-49 CONFERENCE SETBACK AT SAINT AUGUSTINE’S


LADY BULLDOGS SUFFER 71-49 CONFERENCE SETBACK AT SAINT AUGUSTINE’S

RALEIGH, N.C. - Bowie State University had no answer on the road against Saint Augustine's University and were beaten 71-49 by the Lady Falcons. The loss, Bowie State’s third in a row, dips the young Lady Bulldogs record to 4-7 overall and 1-3 in the CIAA.

The Lady Bulldogs shot just 26.6 percent from the field (17-of-64) but were led by junior Jasmine Jacobs with nine points. Sophomore Bria Robinson contributed eight points, a team-high eight rebounds and added two steals and a blocked shot. Junior Alessandra Flores Conway finished with seven points to go along with a personal season best of six rebounds and sophomore Channell Mackey scored five points.

Bowie State kept it close most of the first half until Saint Augustine’s went on a 17-7 run to close the first half. With the Lady Bulldogs leading by three (12-9), Jeanne-Marie Wilson scored the next five points to shift the advantage over to the Lady Falcons for good at the 9:35 mark of the first half.

The Saint Augustine’s bench outscored the Bowie State bench 26-6 in the first half as the Lady Falcons strolled into halftime with a 31-19 cushion.  Thirteen first half turnovers by the Lady Bulldogs resulted in 13 first period points for the Lady Falcons.

Saint Augustine’s (6-7 / 2-2 CIAA) kept the pressure on in the second half and stretched the home lead to 52-29 by the 9:37 mark.

Bowie State scored just two field goals in the first four minutes of the second half, both of which came from Flores Conway. Sophomore Jasmine McIntosh narrowed the Lady Bulldogs deficit down to 13 (39-26) with 15:21 left in the game, but BSU would get no closer.

Saint Augustine’s ended the night shooting at a 43.8 percent clip from the field (21-of-48), which included 6-of-13 beyond the arc (46.2 percent) and 65.7 percent (23-of-35) from the free throw line.

The Lady Falcons were led by Regmine McCombs and Wilson with 14 and 13 points respectively and Ebony Spencer chipped in 10 points. Lakiya Rouse tied for game-high rebound honors with eight and Porscha Walton dished out a team-high three assists.

Bowie State returns to action on Saturday (1/12) at Shaw University. Game time is set for 2 pm in Shaw’s C.C. Spaulding Gymnasium.

Shaw 76 - Bowie State 55 (WOMEN'S Bb FINAL)


SHAW LADY BEARS DOMINATE BOWIE STATE LADY BULLDOGS 76-55


RALEIGH, N.C. – Bowie State sophomore Jasmine McIntosh (Bowie, Md.) scored a team-high 15 points but Shaw University had little trouble defeating the Lady Bulldogs 76-55. It was the fourth straight loss for Bowie State and drops the Lady Bulldogs record to 4-9 overall and 1-4 in the conference.

McIntosh hit three of the Lady Bulldogs three three-pointers which contributed to her total of 15 points. She also tied for team-high rebounds, grabbing six. Senior Jasmine Jacobs and junior Alessandra Flores Conway contributed nine points each and junior Brooke Miles tied for team-high rebounds with six.

Shaw had 52 total rebounds with 32 of them coming on the defensive end. The Lady Bulldogs had 38 boards which broke down to 11 offensive and 27 defensive.

The Lady Bulldogs held their largest lead of the game at 18-13 following a 3-point bucket by McIntosh with 13:13 left in the opening period. The game slipped away from Bowie State at the 10:34 mark of the first half as Shaw went on a 7-0 run that created a seven-point cushion that later led to a 41-29 halftime bulge.

The Lady Bears hit 12-of-37 first half field goals (32.4 percent) but made a living at the free throw line in the first 20 minutes, making 13-of-18 (72.2 percent). BSU’s Lady Bulldogs made 10-of-24 from the field (41.7 percent) but had only four first half free throw attempts, making one.  Bowie State first half turnovers (19) also paid dividends for Shaw as the Lady Bears turned those miscues into 16 points.

Shaw (12-2 / 4-1 CIAA) began the second half with another 7-0 run before Bowie State’s McIntosh stopped the run with a jumper at the 16:03 mark. The Lady Bears lead ballooned to 66-36 by the midway point of the second half.  

Taylor Dalrymple and Ronika Ransford paced the Lady Bears with 17 and 16 points respectively. Dalrymple pulled down eight rebounds to tie with teammate Crystal Harris.

Shaw held a decisive advantage at the free throw line, knocking down 25-of-39 compared to just 5-of-10 for Bowie State.

The Lady Bulldogs will conclude their three-game southern swing, making a final stop at Fayetteville State on Monday (1/14) night.

UDC Men's Basketball Falls at LIU Post, 84-73


 
January 12, 2013

District of Columbia Suffers 84-73 Defeat at LIU Post

BROOKVILLE, NY – The University of the District of Columbia men's basketball team was defeated by LIU Post, 84-73 on Saturday afternoon in East Coast Conference play at the Pratt Center.
The Firebirds fell to 2-11 overall and 1-4 in league play with the loss while the reigning conference champion Pioneers improved to 10-3 overall and a perfect 5-0 in the ECC.
Junior transfer guard Michael Terry (Criminal Justice – Philadelphia, PA/Boston U) led the Firebirds with team-highs of 21 points and five rebounds. Senior transfer forward D'Angelo Johnson (Mass Media – Washington, DC/Virginia St.) and junior transfer point guard Quasim Jones (Business Management – Philadelphia, PA/Johnson CC) added 14 and 13 points, respectively as well.
Meanwhile, the Pioneers were led by the ECC pre-season player of the year, Tobin Carberry. The 3rd highest scorer in the league coming into the game, Carberry shot 8-of-15 from the field to finish with a game-high 25 points and pulled down 11 rebounds from his guard position. Reserve guard Jonathan Kohler also added 19 points while starting guard Vaughn Allen registered 15 points and 11 rebounds. Charles McCann came off the bench to pitch in with a game-high 13 rebounds, including eight on the offensive glass.
District of Columbia out-shot LIU Post 48-percent to 39-percent from the field and made just as many three-pointers with one less attempt (8-of-23 vs. 8-of-24). The Firebirds were also a more efficient team with 15 assists and just 12 turnovers compared to LIU Post's 17 assists and 22 turnovers. However, the most glaring statistical disparity came in the rebounding column. The league's best rebounding team, LIU Post, dominated on the boards with 61 rebounds compared to the Firebirds' 21. The Pioneers also got to the free-throw line more often and shot much better when they did. They made 22-of-27 (82-percent) compared to District of Columbia's 9-of-19 (47-percent). District of Columbia, limited to just two substitutes throughout the game, was also outscored 30-10 in bench points.   
Carberry started the game off with back-to-back three-pointers on his first two shot attempts of the game. He scored 11 points in the first 4:13 of action to help the Pioneers grab an early 17-7 lead. Quasim Jones' three-pointer about three minutes later capped a 7-2 Firebirds run which cut the deficit to five, but LIU Post answered back with an 11-2 run to claim a 30-16 lead about halfway through the first stanza. The Firebirds were trailing by 12 with under three minutes to play when the Pioneers closed out the half on a 5-0 run to take a 17-point cushion (46-29) into intermission.
A determined Firebirds squad, coming off its second win of the season on Wednesday night against St. Thomas Aquinas, out-scored LIU Post 14-4 in the opening 4:48 and closed the 17-point halftime gap to just seven (50-43) following a made jumper by D'Angelo Johnson. That was as close as the Firebirds would come the rest of the way, as the Pioneers put the game away with a frantic 17-2 power surge in a span of just 4:01 to take a 67-45 lead as the clock approached 10-minutes. The LIU Post lead ballooned at 82-58 at the 4:12 mark before the Firebirds closed out the game on a 15-2 run for a final verdict of 84-73.
Next up, the Firebirds will visit ECC foe Dowling on Wednesday, January 16th at 7 p.m.