I
am still relatively young in the profession of teaching and coaching. I
am halfway through my 15th year teaching high school math and I have 27
seasons of coaching under my belt between track and field (15), cross
country (6), and football (6).
In
terms of coaching, there was a point in my career where I felt I knew
enough, and that was somewhat correct. I knew enough to have success,
but not nearly enough to be considered an expert. I have heard ITCCCA Hall of Fame coach Tony Holler
say, “I was a pretty good coach before I knew anything.” I think this
applied to me. Most of the time, I was able to motivate athletes and
provide an atmosphere for them to thrive. I made mistakes, but for the
most part, athletes improved and we had success as a program. The result
of this? A false reflection of what I was.The graph below depicts the Dunning-Kruger effect, a phenomenon observed in a series of experiments by psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger. It is my personal favorite (which is saying a lot because I really like graphs). I view it daily because it serves as a reminder to spend time each day acquiring knowledge.
Figure 1: This graph was created by Simon Wardley. He openly admits it is a joke and not based on concrete data, but I definitely think there is much truth to it.
Dunning summarizes the effect by saying, “Incompetence does not leave people disoriented, perplexed, or cautious. Instead, the incompetent are often blessed with an inappropriate confidence, buoyed by something that feels to them like knowledge.” [i]
Somewhere around 10 years ago, I was at the peak of the “I'm an expert” phase. I felt I had a reasonable answer to just about any question I was asked. I was unaware saying “I don't know” was the most empowering phrase I could say because it would provide me with an opportunity to learn. According to Dunning,
My bias to thinking I knew enough was further fueled by hearing much of the same material whenever I attended a professional development function (both in teaching and coaching). However, I slowly began to pull myself out of the “I'm an expert” phase. There were many moments along the way that caused my inflated opinion of my knowledge to begin to deflate, and as I write this, I am fully into the “I know nothing” phase, though I certainly do not feel that I am an expert.
As I have worked my way through this journey towards higher expertise in coaching, one item that has really begun to bother me about coaches at the high school level are ones who are completely entrenched in their ways. When challenged, the typical response is, “This is the way we have always done it, and we have had success.”
Image courtesy of Marjorie Sarnat
This bothers me because I was completely guilty of saying it myself, and there is no doubt that every time I said it, it was the most unintelligent phrase I could have said at that particular moment! It truly exudes ignorance. A much better response would be, “This is why we do it: __________. This is why we feel it translates to success: __________. What do you see that could make it better?” Dunning supports this thought-process by saying,
“The trick is to be your own devil's advocate: to think through how your favored conclusions might be misguided; to ask yourself how you might be wrong, or how things might turn out differently from what you expect. Most importantly: Seek advice. Other people may have their own misbeliefs, but a discussion can often be sufficient to rid a serious person of his or her most egregious misconceptions.”1
When I devote my time to sport, most of it directed to track and field, which has the “simple” objectives of getting athletes to run faster, jump higher, and jump and throw farther. A track coaches “x's and o's” are based in finding ways to get athletes to achieve those objectives. We don't have to worry about running offensive or defensive sets or game plan for our opponents. Training our athletes is our game plan. We constantly self-scout.
From this perspective, I find it unfortunate when I see coaches who:
- Feel their training
programs (workouts) are the prime contributor of their athletes making
progress. I see this a lot in the track and field community. I feel the
primary reasons the vast majority of high school athletes improve over
time is because they have a low training age and they are still
developing physically. If a high school athlete is exposed to a
reasonable training stimulus, he or she will tend to respond favorably. I
would even argue that the stimulus doesn't even have to be completely
specific to the task.
For example, imagine a 16 year-old who has little to no experience in athletics and begins running to get faster in the 100 meters. On day one, he gets timed in the 100 meters. For the next 6 weeks, his training consists of running a mile as fast as he can 2-3 times per week. At the end of the 6 weeks he times himself in the 100 meters. I think there would be a very good chance that his time would be better than it was on day one. Just because your program has produced athletes who have improved and had success, it does not necessarily mean that you have achieved optimal improvement and success for those athletes.
You can be happy about what your program has achieved, but you should never be satisfied. Therefore, you should always be open to criticism and investigating ways to improve. -
Say, “If that athlete was in my
program, he/she would be performing at a way higher level.” Honestly,
how the heck can anyone say that with complete certainty? Furthermore,
many coaches go to another level and start coaching kids who aren't on
their team. While the intentions may be good, I think it just leads to
additional confusion for the athlete and performance suffers even more.
-
Defines a high school athlete's
experience by discouraging them to participate in other sports, mainly
because they feel their program will do a better job developing the
athlete. This often combines the concepts in #1 and #2 (my workouts are
the best and the athlete will end up being better by only being involved
my program).
Current statistics and research continually show that being involved in multiple sports is healthier and allows athletes to reach a higher ceiling, but even taking that out of the picture, shouldn't our student athletes get to choose what their high school experience will be? We have already had our high school experience, let them have theirs. Don't make them live with regret in the future.
It's important to have a set of governing principles, but they need to be malleable and progressive. If you are a young coach, do your best to avoid the “I'm an expert phase.” One of my biggest regrets in coaching is spending time in that phase. If you feel you know enough, start asking different questions and look for information in different places.
If you are a coach with substantial experience, asking yourself if any of this applies to you may be difficult. Recognizing that it may and implementing changes would be even more difficult, but I guarantee your future athletes are already thanking you.
About Rob Assise
Rob Assise is in his 15th year teaching mathematics and coaching track and field at Homewood-Flossmoor High School. He also has had experience coaching football and cross country. His writing can be found at Simplifaster, Just Fly Sports, and ITCCCA. He can be reached via e-mail at robertassise@gmail.com or Twitter @HFJumps
[i] Dunning, David. “We Are All Confident Idiots.”
https://psmag.com/we-are-all-confident-idiots-56a60eb7febc#.at06x01mo. October, 2014.
Click here for more helpful articles
