Do You Really Need a Flu Shot? New Research Suggests Otherwise
Author
Isaac Eliaz
The
government and pharmaceutical companies would have us believe that many
segments of the population must get vaccinated against the flu every
year to protect their health. These supposedly "high risk" groups
include pregnant women, children less than five years of age (and
especially children under the age of two) and everyone aged 50 and
older. Is this information truly accurate and based on sound science?
Maybe not. (Continued below.....)
In this video, cancer researcher Ty Bollinger speaks with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, vaccine expert, about why she was criticized by Unicef and how conventional doctors are missing vital information about vaccine safety. The full interview with Dr. Tenpenny is part of "The Quest For The Cures Continues" docu-series.
------------------------------------------
The Truth About Vaccines docu-series is COMING SOON! Secure your free, virtual seat for the 10-day online health event right here. ➡️ https://bit.ly/3ol2UzE
(.....Continued......)Safety and Efficacy
In recent years, medical experts around the world have been
questioning the conventional wisdom of flu vaccines. One researcher who
reviewed the studies on influenza vaccines concluded in an article
published in British Medical Journal that their effectiveness cannot be
confirmed. He also observed that there is inadequate research to
demonstrate their safety, stating, "The large gap between policy and
what the data tell us (when rigorously assembled and evaluated) is
surprising."
Childhood Flu Vaccine Inhibits Development of T-Cells
A newly published study in the Journal of Virology adds additional
weight to the case against routine influenza vaccinations. Researchers
have found that vaccinating children annually against the flu virus
interferes with the development of virus-specific killer T cells. This
means that the annual flu vaccine may protect children against the
actual viruses in the vaccine, but at the same time makes them more
vulnerable to any other virus that they are exposed to.
Support Your Immune System Naturally
As an integrative medical doctor, I believe that you can support your
immune system naturally with a combination of healthy nutritional
choices and targeted supplements for immune support. It is generally not
necessary to introduce viruses, chemicals and heavy metals into our
bodies in the form of a vaccination.
Common sense and scientific research tell us that one of the most
important strategies for staying well is to wash your hands frequently.
Washing with soap and running water for 20 seconds is the most effective
way to cleanse your hands of all kinds of germs.
It is also important to get enough sleep (greater than 7 hours per
night), get moderate exercise and not overwork (less then 10 hours per
day).
Nutritional approaches to a healthy immune system include eating
plenty of green vegetables, reducing or eliminating consumption of
refined sugars and processed foods, and supplementing with immune
boosting vitamins, minerals, herbs and botanicals.
Immune Support Supplements
You can support your body’s innate health mechanisms with certain
scientifically-researched formulas and compounds that combine cutting
edge science with traditional wisdom. These will offer comprehensive
health support whenever you need it most: during the winter season, when
under stress, while travelling and for daily protection. Here are some
of my top recommendations for supporting immune health during the winter
and year round.
One of my top recommendations is a blend of six medicinal mushrooms
with additional immune boosting beta glucans. The mushrooms in this
formula have been used for thousands of years to promote optimal
functioning of the immune system and support overall health. However,
this formula is unique because the mushrooms are cultivated in the US on
a blend of powerful immune supporting herbs which enhance the
mushrooms’ natural immune boosting properties. When combined in a
comprehensive formula with additional beta-glucans, medicinal mushrooms
are an excellent way to boost your body’s natural defenses and combat
infection, especially on a long term basis. Mushrooms are also of great
benefit during times of acute stress or infection, as they can be taken
in frequent doses with no known side effects.
Another recommendation is a Tibetan herbal formula made with a blend
of 19 rare and powerful botanicals that contain a multitude of
health-promoting tannins, polyphenols, flavonoids and essential oils.
This traditional formula has "cooling" properties that support balanced
immune function, increased circulation and healthy antioxidant activity.
Last, but most importantly is Modified Citrus Pectin, the first
natural Galectin-3 blocker. Scientists are now finding that blocking
harmful excess Galectin-3 molecules in the body is critical in promoting
cellular health and long term wellness. In addition to binding and
blocking Galectin-3 throughout the body, research demonstrates that
regular use of Modified Citrus Pectin offers powerful immune support and
also safely detoxifies harmful heavy metals and environmental toxins
without side effects.
Integrative medicine treats the whole person, rather than the symptom
or illness. As a result, these and other natural health solutions offer
powerful immune support while simultaneously promoting overall health
and protecting against chronic illness over the long term. And that’s
an area where many conventional solutions fall short.
Dr. Isaac Eliaz, M.D., MS., L.Ac., has been a pioneer in
integrative medicine since the early 1980s. He is a respected
researcher, innovative product formulator, clinical practitioner, author
and lecturer. Dr. Eliaz is widely regarded as the leading expert in the
field of Modified Citrus Pectin research and has been using Modified
Citrus Pectin in his clinical practice for over 15 years to treat a
variety of conditions.
During
the past few years, there have been drastic improvements in medication
and disease treatment, either on a genetic, neurosurgery or psychiatric
level. These improvements have resulted in curing numerous illnesses and
improving the lives of people in moral, social, economic and
environmental ways. (Continued below.....)
(....Continued....)It is said that every one out of four people in our world suffer from
some kind of mental problem today. Professionals are trying desperately
to cure these disorders using psychological or medical treatment.
Although, since all diseases are different, it can sometimes be
difficult to predict how, when or to what extent is the person going to
recover. Some treatment takes years and years of therapy and hand work.
One of these kinds of disorders is Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID),
previously known as Multiple Personality Disorder. (MPD)
DID is one of the rarest, most complicated diseases. Statistics show
that only as little as 1% of the world’s whole population is diagnosed
with DID. It is described as a "condition in which two or more distinct
identities or personality states, also known as alters are present
in-and alternately take control of an individual." It is a coping
mechanism for extreme, continuous traumatic events that happened at the
ages of 6-9. Dissociation or detachment from reality can be a way of
protecting the person from painful experiences. In this way, different
personalities experience the trauma, leaving the host with no memory of
the event.
To be diagnosed with DID, the person must meet all of the symptoms
and criteria common for this decease. The symptoms include a sense of
"losing time" while the other alter has control of the body, confusion,
feelings of dissociation, memory gaps and amnesia between the switches
to different alters and out of character behavior, which is caused by
distinctive personalities of alters. It is also important to take into
account that all people with DID also experience flashbacks and
persistent nightmares and therefore are sure to have post-traumatic
stress disorder.
The first person to discover DID was a French physician Jean-Martin
Charrot, in 18080s. At first, there wasn’t much known about this
disease, so it was thought to combine traits of hysteria and epilepsy
and so they called it Hystereo-Ehilepsy. Later on, the assumption was
proved wrong and the name was changed into Multiple Personality
Disorder, up until 1994. By this time, the condition was described as
proliferation of new, separate personalities, although this idea was was
also proved wrong by further investigations and better understanding
of the disease in the later years. It’s name finally changed to
Dissociative Identity Disorder, as it’s characterized by fragmentation
of a personality, rather than a growth of a new one.
One of the essential parts of treating DID is through long-term
psychotherapy, with a goal of integrating different personalities into
one. However, DID can also be treated in numerous other ways, including
psychiatry, some medication, desensitization and reprocessing method,
clinical hypnosis, creative therapies, dialectic-behavior therapy, eye
movement and cognitive-behavior therapy.
During the psychotherapy sessions, the therapist’s main goal is to to
"relieve the symptoms, ensure the safety of an individual and those
around him or her and "reconnect" the different personalities into one
integrated, well-functioning identity." It is important the the person
learns to safely express and process the traumatic memories, develop new
coping skills and improve relationships.
If during the treatment, some cognitive-behavioral therapy is
included, then the focus will also be in changing dysfunctional thinking
patterns and behaviors.
Another technique that’s called eye movement desensitization
reprocessing (EMDR), is meant to treat people who experience flashbacks,
nightmares and other symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.
Creative therapies, for example art therapy or music therapy allow
people to express their thoughts, feelings and experiences in a safe and
creative environment.
Meditation and relaxation techniques focus on helping people to
better tolerate, understand and communicate with their alters. They
include digraphic breathing, 2-minute relaxation, body scanning and much
more.
Clinical hypnosis-another way of treating DID can be similar to
meditation and relaxation techniques. This method uses intense
relaxation and concentration to "achieve an altered state of
consciousness" and allows people to explore their hidden thoughts,
feelings and memories that might have been lost from their conscious
minds.
Last but not least, medication too, can help on the way of treating
DID. Although there is no specific medication to cure the dissociative
disorders directly, people still highly benefit from taking some
antidepressants or anti-anxiety medications.
All this effort put into the treatment of different mental diseases
clearly have a very outstanding result. Different kinds of treatment
may effect different parts of person’s lifestyle. Proper treatment can
improve person’s moral values and social life. For example, researches
have shown that most people who receive psychotherapy show a huge
benefit from it. In most cases, they experience symptom relief. With
less mental problems to worry about, people focus on their goals and
become much more productive. Without any more worries and weights on
their shoulders from all the pain caused by the illnesses, they become
more high spirited, positive and start working on a more sustainable and
healthy lifestyle with improved states of mind. This improves their
moral values and a way of living. People also start to have better and
healthier relationships with people around them, which effects their
social life. (Continued below....)
(.....Continued.....)As a proof of this, we can discuss a small experiment, conducted in
Henry Phipps Psychiatric Clinic, where twelve patients were given four
tests before and after psychotherapy. Two of these tests were given to
the patients’ therapists. "People who improved tended to revise certain
of their moral values in the direction of their therapists’, while the
moral values of patients who were unimproved tended to become less like
their therapists’."
But of course, like everything else, treatment comes with it’s own
disadvantages. As mentioned before, while treating DID antidepressants
can be used in benefit of the patient, but antidepressants, along with
other medications can have side effects. They are mainly aimed to
correct chemical imbalances of neurotransmitters in the brain and
increase their numbers, but because antidepressants don’t only effect
one of our brain parts, in some cases they might cause jitteriness, dry
mouth and blurry eyes, which typically go away after a week or two. But
other symptoms caused by them may last much longer. Such is: nausea,
increased appetite and wight gain, loss of sexual desire, fatigue and
drowsiness, agitation, irritability and so on. This can be explained by
the fact that antidepressants work on every parts of our brain, like
frontal lobes, temporal lobes, hippocampus, amygdala, brain stem and so
on.
Along with incorrect use of antidepressants, psychotherapy may have
negative effects as well. Firstly, therapy is very expensive, so getting
a proper treatment may not be affordable to everyone and put huge debts
on person, which will highly effect their financial status and economic
well-being. But many other things can go wrong during psychotherapy
sessions. The person might not be a professional and instead of curing
the patient, unproved treatment and false diagnosis will result in far
worse results. This might cause the person’s condition to worsen and
destroy their social and moral status. In this case, therapist might
face malpractice because of legal responsibility towards the patient.
Many therapists today don’t really understand what the patient needs
and therefore, their interventions are ineffective. This is caused by
unprofessionalism and limited range of knowledge in some specific
diseases. An evidence of this can be a website on internet called "very
bad therapy" which uses podcasts to give voices to the stories of
people’s terrible experiences with their therapists. Just the fact that
there are so many people active on this website is a proof alone that
many therapists can’t be trusted.
Treatment surely comes with a lots of advantages, along with
disadvantages. Although, since the number of mentally ill people
nowadays is still relatively high, avoiding any kind of treatment
because of their disadvantages will be unreasonable. Antidepressants may
have their side effects and some therapists might not know how to
properly do their job, but most of the people who have gone through
psychotherapy have changed their therapists numerous times, until they
found the one they were comfortable with. So it’s only a matter of
finding the right psychotherapist and some financial support for
sessions and medications. Therefore, mental health treatment should be
available to everyone and must be achieved by those who need it, because
untreated people are most likely to contribute to higher medical
expenses, poorer performance at school and work, fewer employment
opportunities and increased risk of suicide.
In the end, we can state with confidence that treatment is an
important part of healthy life for mentally ill people and studying
these diseases is even more important. Without a proper understanding of
the illness, people can not find the cure and treat them. Just like
dissociative identity disorder, which was previously misunderstood and
mistaken for a completely different mental condition. The very first
patients with this disorder used to be treated in ways unimaginable for
modern society. The "treatment" included electric shock therapy, which
meant electric currents were passed through the person’s brain, which
would cause a seizure. This was thought to adjust self-view of the
patients, which would cause the symptoms to go away, but of course,
since they had no understanding of the disease itself, their treatment
methods were not effective and therefore worsened the conditions of the
patients. This is exactly why, in today’s society, it is very important
to have educated people working as psychotherapists, psychiatrists and
other professionals who are dedicated to improving the lives of ill
people.
Daily life gives us plenty of issues to struggle with that can get the best of us. Whether or not they defeat us depends on how we think. We may have learned negative ways of thinking that don’t do us any good, and wonder why we can’t succeed in life. To make any progress, we first need to change our attitudes and mental outlook to agree with God’s Word.
God loves us just as we are and He welcomes us with all our emotional baggage, but He wants to transform us for the better. He does this through the help of the Holy Spirit, who teaches us how to rightly divide the Word of truth. Real change begins on the inside and works its way out. We’re transformed by renewing our minds; this opens us up to discover the good and perfect will of God concerning us.
We don’t ever have to wonder what God’s will is for our lives; it’s overwhelmingly good. The thoughts He thinks toward us are thoughts of peace, not evil, to give us hope and a future. Agreeing with God lets Him start cleaning out all the unproductive thought processes we’ve learned from the world and replacing them with more successful ways of thinking.
We learn right-believing according to His Word by studying and meditating on it, and asking the Holy Spirit to help us properly apply it to whatever situation we’re facing. This is far better than trying to figure everything out ourselves. The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of grace, and the helper Jesus promised to send us. He teaches us to trust in the Lord with all our hearts and not to lean on our own understanding; acknowledging Him in all our ways allows Him to direct our paths in the process of our transformation.
There’s no need to struggle alone. We can’t possibly stay the same when we trust God to change us. Relying on Him always gives us amazing results.
Prayer:
Father God, You gave us the Holy Spirit as a guide to help us change for the better. Positive transformation is only possible with His assistance. We’re grateful for this. In Jesus’ name, amen.
Scriptures:
2 Timothy 2:15
Romans 12:2
Jeremiah 29:11, NKJV
John 15:26, NKJV
John 16:7, NKJV
Proverbs 3:5, 6
For more on how God changes us, click on the link to find the minibook, Grace for Transformation, in our eStore.
In John
10:10 Jesus is quoted as saying, "... I am come that they might have
life and that they might [live] it more abundantly." Many ministers and
lay members of the church are afraid to acknowledge this scripture
because they feel that it casts a less than favorable light upon
themselves and members of their church if they are not all living as
abundantly a Jesus professed they ought to live. (Continued below..........)
Pastor Mark Driscoll Discusses Covid, Fear and Faith | Ash Wednesday
What are your religious beliefs? And how do those views influence your take on politics or dealing with things like the COVID pandemic?
(.........Continued.........)The first approach to denigrating the belief in abundance is to
suggest that God was not referring to financial well-being, a fine
education, quality trade skills, good health, fine relationships and all
other things that normal humans would associate with an abundant,
quality life. But, in Matthew 7:9-11, God counters that line of thinking
with, "... what man is there of you, whom if his son asks [for] bread,
will he give him a stone? Or if he asks [for] a fish, will he give him a
serpent? If [Man], being evil, knows how to give good gifts unto your
children, how much more shall your Father in heaven give good things to
them [who] ask Him?" This reminds us that even a lowly good man (or
woman), given the means, would do as well as s/he is able for loved
family, and God is infinitely more loving, able and willing. God was
already identified in Ephesian 3:20 as He who "is able to do exceeding
abundantly above all that we can ask or think, according to the power
that works in us". That power (dynamis, G1411, Strong's concordance)
referred to here is ability of the Redeemed to apply God's power (of His
Faith via His Word) to do mighty works, exhibit astonishing feats of
strength, perform miracles, display uncommon virtue, behave with uncanny
morality and demonstrate incomparable mental skill and emotional
sensitivity. We are also empowered to gain uncommon social influence,
power, wealth, and resources with or without armies.
To be even more emphatic about the fullness of the abundance of life
that the Redeemed should live, preceding post-resurrection ascension to
Heaven, Jesus spoke to a couple disciples as recorded in John 12: 12-14,
saying "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the
works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he
do; because I go unto my Father. And, whatsoever ye shall ask in My
Name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If ye
shall ask any thing in My Name, I will do it."
The above-described messages are very clear to me. If any Believer
attempts to tell you otherwise, let them consider acquiring a much
stronger dose of belief. Christians are to live abundantly, in fact,
more abundantly.
We have both formal training and many years of experience engaging in writing on topics of Christian content.
Presented on US Sports Net by Game Planner Pro! Enter Code USSports to save 10% off the annual subscription. For Football Coaches, By Football Coaches Learn More...
Allen Fitzpatrick's Skills and Drills for Lacrosse
Want to elevate your lacrosse game? Allen Fitzpatrick demonstrates how you can improve your performance on the field by in this detailed overview of his game-proven training plan. The skills and drills featured in this instructional video course will benefit lacrosse players from the youth level all the way to the college level.
Head Boys' Lacrosse Coach at Lawrenceville School, N.J
Allen Fitzpatrick is the longtime head boys' lacrosse coach at the Lawrenceville School in Lawrenceville, N.J., where in 2008 his team won its seventh consecutive state Prep ‘A’ championship. Fitzpatrick holds the single season assist record at Middlebury College (50) and was second in Division II scoring his senior year (1978) with 84 points.
Just a quick note praying for you and yours a great thanksgiving, surrounded by family, friends, food, and most of all love. Happy Thanksgiving from US Sports Network!
-Coach Nate
Army Physical Fitness Standards
Author
Bryant Towell
Athletics
aren't the only component of being a great soldier, but you'll never
become one at all if you don't meet the Army physical fitness standards.
The United States Army takes physical fitness extremely seriously, and
soldiers have to be in tip-top shape to make it through training. High
physical fitness scores are also essential for soldiers who want to gain
promotions and move up the ranks. Here are the three main components of
the Army physical fitness standards.
Self-Taught calisthenics master Austin Dunham shows you the best exercises to progress toward handstand pushups!
► BLACK FRIDAY DEAL Vista Totally Wireless Earbuds: https://goto.bodybuilding.com/7R5V5
Pushups
Pushups comprise the upper body component of the Army's physical
fitness standards. To perform a proper Army pushup, begin at the top
position with a flat back and fully extended arms. Lower your torso
until your chest touches the floor. Your hands should be placed so that
they are in line with your chest at this bottom position. Once your
reach bottom, push yourself back up and repeat.
To get a perfect 100 score on pushups, you must perform 77
repetitions without stopping. 19 pushups will earn you the minimum 60
points, though such a low score will not bode well for your chances of
advancement with the Army ranks.
Running
Soldiers do a great deal of running at various distances and speeds
throughout their careers. However, the Army's physical fitness test
always involves a two-mile run for time. To get a perfect 100 points on
the run test, you must finish the course in 13:18 or less. The longest
you can take and still pass is 17:00.
The running portion of the test is also the hardest for most
recruits. Army Physical Fitness Standards demand that soldiers have a
great deal of endurance so they can walk, run, hike, and carry equipment
long distances for hours or even days at a time. If you are going to be
taking the APFT, you need to practice running as often as possible.
Sit-ups
The Army also tests abdominal strength and endurance with sit-ups. To
perform a correct sit-up, have a training partner or fellow recruit
hold your ankles in place. Begin with your back flat on the ground and
your hands held clasped behind your head. Keeping your heels on the
ground, sit up until your neck is further forward than the base of your
spine. Lower your torso, and repeat. 82 sit-ups will get you a perfect
score, and you need 29 sit-ups to earn the minimum 60 points.
The sit-ups tend to be the easiest portion of the physical fitness
test for most people, but don't get lazy in your training. You can
quickly build up your abdominal endurance, but you can also quickly lose
it.
A Word on Age and Scoring
The Army Physical Fitness Standards actually include eight different
age-specific scoring guidelines for men. The standards discussed in this
article are the highest - ages 27-31. However, younger recruits still
need to perform nearly as well, and minimum scores are rarely sufficient
for advancement. Those who choose to make the Army a long-term career
will eventually be judged by the 27-31 standards, as well.
The
faltering state of creativity is suggestive of the current condition of
societal interaction that lacks a profound sense of originality,
imagination and vision. That is only the starting point of the
perspective that points in the direction of society’s failure to ascend
to higher levels of intellectual awakening. Creativeness transcends all
that has gone before and provokes a different way of looking at the
reality of human actions. The quest is to transform and rise above
through a myriad pathways to a loftier level of thought and subsequent
achievement. (Continued below...........)
Join Charlene as she interviews Ryan Hartwig about his "insider" knowledge of blatant censorship that is going on at Facebook. Learn more.....
(.........Continued......) Visionary resourcefulness is the formulation and implementation, from
ideation to discovery, the fighting spirit to journey into forgotten
realms of self-evolution. For the quest to unfold the mysteries of
discovery in the adventure of the personal journey, it should not take a
psychologist, or anyone else from the assorted fields of pseudoscience
to tell us what is or is not creativity. That is the essential task of
human individuality to embrace the journey. Yet, by cowardly resistance,
many forsake the sacred nature of the hunt, for the safe consensus of
ease and comfort.
Faltering, failing and fading into the abysmal eventuality of
extinction by boredom, as well as other devolving degradations, the
human species presently suffers a degrading lack of creativity. From
academia to the political arena, including commerce and news reporting,
the bland and uninspiring communal nexus daily demonstrates a slant
toward implosive stupidity. While nothing new under the sun stirs a
probability of dissent as to an ideological lamentation, to suggest
creativity as an absolute would not be the claim in this writing.
Instead, the perspective is multifaceted. To be resourcefulness
infers activity which is intricate and includes physical and mental
actions engaged in a synchronized process of purposeful instigation.
Such inclination, matched by personal proclivity and a bunch of other
complex dimensions, exudes and expresses a mindset determined to bring
about an intended reality. To what has gone before and do something from
a different perspective, using the same foundational basis, strikes at
the central nature of creativity. Yet, with that comes a sense of
humility.
While all human actions reflect choices, to demonstrate by humble
essence artful endeavors, self-evolution speaks toward the maturity of
the innovator. Controlling the egoistic and prideful arrogance as the
artist or inventor, shows an aspect of character that gives special
meaning to that which has been presented. Creativity ought to reflect a
higher state of vision.
To break the habitual way of doing things, bravely questioning the
world and continuing inquiry in spite the answers given, the inquisitive
"mind" ceaselessly torments itself with different ways of thinking.
Problem solving engages the hidden and the known to circumvent the
boring diversions of daily distractions. Urgency to explore the real and
unreal possesses the scary notion of finality at some distant moment.
The primacy of thinking is such that it never ceases in the present
points of reference. So a different perspective outside the normal is
important.
Maybe not different in the sense that historical references have
already suggested similarities, but inspirationally fine tuning the
personal perspective. In order to let play passionate thinking, that
otherwise unleash the imaginative forces within, courageous acts of
presence dares one to be set free. Yet, overall, maturity raises the
criticality of unselfish motivations. Liberation challenges all the
sensory mechanisms to get on the fringes of divergence. Bias precludes
the pure efficacy of absolute objectivity, yet influences just long
enough to provoke maturity.
But for the bias of subjective validation, the player brings his or
her shortcomings to the arena, to claim some diminutive right of
acclaimed validation. To every entry upon a social interaction, everyone
bring preconceptions to the self-interests of the venture. Bias unduly
influences the conclusion, as the observer makes person the observation
as well as the intent of purposeful design. Whether an act of
construction, investigative query, or marking strategy, the observer
hastens the onset of a biased observation. As such, care ought to be
exercised closely, with healthy skeptical inclination toward the
experienced inclination of cynical maturation.
Over a decade ago, a major collegiate business magazine, presumably a
prestigious Ivy League publication, lamented the eroding state of
American creativity. Once powerfully the "land of opportunity", the sad
reality mourns the loss of a competitive edge. While some would argue
the threat is of an external nature, others counter such claims by
suggesting the danger comes from within American society. In a measure
called the "Creative Class Index", the U.S. struggles to maintain 11th
place among 25 others countries. Innovation slowly devolves over time.
Not only is "stupid thinking", or alternatively, "anti-thinking", in
vogue, the perpetual regurgitation of consistent redundancy takes
mainstream center stage. Mundane, lackluster, and dull might be negative
descriptors that could be applied to the "infotainment", or
entertainment realm. While this segment of society represents one part
of the many faceted aspects of creativity, the potential influence is
significant. This includes artists of every kind, writers of various
genres, movie and television production, and 24-7 news reporting and
social commentary.
From the classroom to the boardroom, to commerce and industry, to the
crime lab and the sci-fi wizardry of computer technicians, the
potential for innovation begins with clever, cunning and calculated
ideation. Human ingenuity goes beyond whining and complaining about hurt
feelings or the foolish intolerance to tolerate the differences of
others. Yet, the majority suffer the subjectivity of self-imposed
victimization in their intentional immaturity. Claiming authority, for
instance, where no experience and deeply researched factual analysis
exists foments the illicit redundancy of repetition in foolhardy ways.
As such, in any claim of fame to assert some nebulous notion of
authority on anything ought to be greeted by healthy skepticism.
A claim of special insight, unique exceptional knowledge or boast of a
"new study", is matter of intentional arrogance by the claimant, unless
validation is invited by the necessity of proof. In short, a matter at
hand demonstrates an element of creativity when open-minded debate and
analysis is encouraged. For the betterment of individuality, wiser
enhancements are afforded through mutually accepted skepticism and
rigorous investigation. Uncertainty warrants deeper thinking,
suspiciousness figures the probability of error or deception, and
cynicism encourages alternatives. With that, the consideration of
inventiveness likely comes from the purposeful ideation formulated
through the introspection of serious meditative analysis.
In a devolving society, bent on self-destruction, the cowardice of
conventional conformity, as well as mundane repetition in clichéd or
stereotyped characterizations, as in movies and television, hasten the
faltering state of creativity. In various media of the vast social
networks for "infotainment", personal opinion increasingly supersedes
reliance upon facts, figures and relevant evidentiary validation.
Productive civil engagement for remedial articulation of serious social
issues mires in the abundance of uneducated, ill-experienced and
otherwise poorly informed claimants of one form of "authority" or
"expertise" in favor of another.
Lazy thinking permeates the mainstream replete with countless
examples of intellectually barbarous acts of stupidity. A societal shift
beyond the efficacy of commentary based on the factuality of data,
toward a demeaning and condescending erosion of interactivity debases
the prospects of creative individualism. The shallow nature of
conjecture is destructive. Nebulous conjecture pretends to be ascended
efficacy of intellectual pretentions. With advances in technology comes
foolhardy efforts to prefer playing with apps versus investigating
critical social issues. In a bland, unimaginative and mundane atmosphere
in which creativity is neither inspiring nor motivational, a debasing
prospect suggests regressive inclination toward collapse.
In an overly pampered, gluttonous, and shallow thinking culture, one
in which alleged "social warriors" pontificate egregious fallacies of
bogus conjecture, the warning signs are evident of an "empire’s" eminent
collapse. By easy and willful seduction, many allow their senses to be
dulled to the extent necessary to their self-validation that overrides
the necessity to be artistic. At a rudimentary level of ideation,
originality is likely no more than taking the known aspects of reality
and reconstructing the elemental materiality in more resourceful ways.
Of such proclivities, the primacy of thinking, or provoking imaginative
prospects, is essential. According to some who philosophize on these
matters, the creative person is a risk taker in a process of maturation.
By neither rule nor restraint, creativity is the boundless process of
rising above the mainstream.
Likewise, moving oneself to become a mature adult, who seeks wisdom
at more enlightened and liberated levels, relates to the vitality of
inspirational creativity. Self-evolving to become a more differentiated
personality requires hard work to become a better version of the
original self. Therein resides the spooky and creepy aversion to
inventiveness. Relentless self-reliance in rigorous energetic actions to
ensure intellectual, experiential and skillful productive development
demands arduous labors. With that heavy mindful lifting, diligent
dedication is exhausting. For the immediacy of the moment, a potent
inner sense of urgency pursues a fanciful notion that demonstrates
imaginative workings of willful effort.
The thinker dreams in farsighted ways to chase an adventure through
the multidimensional intricacy of inventive ideations. Even though
fearful, threatening and debasing the animosities might be, the images
of dreaming insights beyond the normal realm necessitate ignoring the
detractors. Determination in personal differentiation for the wholeness
of individuality within, invites the strength of healthy skepticism,
tinctured by a modicum of cynical insightfulness. That’s of the utmost
necessity to avoid submission to the constraints of normalcy.
On that, who decides the delineation between normal and abnormal? For
the sake of status quo, the easy way is opposite the well-worn paths of
"playing the game" and avoiding risks. It’s all too simple to follow
the rest of the group and avoid controversy. Such does not require a lot
of thought, habits, patterns and redundancy are simplistic. Routine
emotional reactivity is not as demanding and doesn’t require deeply
researched data or thoroughly substantiated evidence. If abnormal, for
instance, is viewed outside the safe space of conformity to "social
rules", then who makes the distinction? Noted here are the duly
constituted ordinances and statutes, as matters of codified law, that
officially define "normality" in terms of civil and criminal behavior.
As to the realm of social interaction, public discourse, goings and
comings in various relationships, at play, in school or at work, an
unimaginative sense of complacency disturbs the thrills of adventure.
Added to that, is the regressive reactivity of economic and political
activities that devolve to the level of infantile narcissism in
spiraling negativity. In all probability, the lethargy of stagnant,
dull, and unoriginal inventiveness kills any semblance of productive
abnormality. In the view of some passionately creative people, being
abnormal is an act defiance against the mundane, the superficial and
fraudulent. Atypical artistry is shunned. Acting outside the cubical of
standard societal templates is alarming to those inside cubic
limiations.
Templates for which the conjecture is that one size fits all remain
persistent against the artisans of desirable transforming processes.
Yet, normalcy decries the abnormality of being different from the rest.
Other than legally defined statutory prohibitions, who or what decides
what is normal? Self-differentiation in a self-evolving quest of
personal growth and maturity, is all about being different than everyone
else. By contrast, mass marketing, global consumerism, educational and
political status quo processes, collude to promote sameness. From school
yard to workplace, a submissive haze of consensus is better described
as acceptance of "manufactured consent".
Others will readily proclaim that everyone is different, unique and
special, yet at some point, below the horizon of creative enterprises,
acquiescence gives way to status quo symbiosis. The suggestion here is,
the inclination to suggest a healthy sense about interdependence, is
misleading and dangerous. Perhaps a better term is parasitic, to
describe a lackluster state of affairs in which dull and boring is view
as exciting. Unoriginal, unimaginative and unmotivated, additionally
describe a social drama that cuts across socio-economic and political
boundaries. To paraphrase a famous scientist of the last century, more
important than knowledge is imagination.
It doesn’t take an academic to come up with a "startling revelation"
that the U.S. suffers a loss of creativity across the wide spectrum of
social endeavors. While some would accuse one generation over another,
the loss of inventiveness crosses generational boundaries. As societies
devolve, the fearful and ignorant hesitation to free oneself from all
the gluttonous proclivities of crowd consensus, from assumption to
consumption, from reason to emotion, breeds the bleeding discontent of
defeatism. For all human history’s lessons, the species ignores and
forgets the essentiality of the prologues to subsequent generational
consequences. The descriptions of some describes others as stupid,
inept, and incompetent. Serious self-reflection, profound
self-transformation and calmness are often vacant upon the isles of
wisdom’s serenity.
To be alone in persistent and profound introspection is to be a
rebel. A few brave ones can do that. The desire to be left alone, to
escape and evade the herded busy intersections of social media and
communal groupings, is a proclamation of independence. It is a mature
and wise insistence of choice and requires action that adversely goes
against the toleration of unquestioned consensus. Being a "social
warrior" does not require either crowd or faction, and neither following
nor fans. Instead, such is a state of exceptional creativity that
ceaselessly wanders beyond the normal range of imagination. Fantasies
come out of the shadows to share in the self-reliance.
It is a perpetual dream state, beyond being awake and asleep. Realms
of creativity are those mental places that transcend an awakened
consciousness and pursues a persistent quest of discovery. For that, the
valiant knight, the crusader, or the warrior perseveres in cautious
proximity to the admonitions and desecrations of mainstream society. As
there are many critics, there are fewer artists, as there are multitudes
of detractors but a handful of innovators. In the sensual touch of
creative instigation, to the culmination of "out of the box"
inclination, some would argue the decline of human innovation. Such is a
generalization with many aspects.
Nonetheless, some researchers would contend that creativity in the
U.S. has regressed since the 1990’s. The proactive introduction of that
which is a variation on something, and can be described as being
creative or imaginative for a moment in time, seems increasingly rare.
One study suggests that in the marketplace of competitive commerce,
competency relies more and more on being creatively engaged within the
organization. To that end, as one business review magazine laments,
openness to alternative viewpoints appears constrained by easy
acceptance of the status quo. Personal ingenuity is out in front of
doing things that might be considered edgy.
Creativity lurches in many directions to enhance and expand the
reaches of the imagination toward a more ascended transformation.
Inventiveness suffers the decline of its relevance in a mechanistic
consumption oriented society. Thoughtful innovations in arts and
entertainment struggle for the passionate zealousness to fuse feeling
and meaning. A recent assessment from a major business institute
challenges the current educational model in America’s K-12 and
collegiate school systems. The accusation is made that contemporary
education stifles a student’s creativity in condescending and
counterproductive ways. By the promotion of a "one size fits all"
template, or persistent admonitions to avoid risk taking, problem
solving, inventiveness and being different. The condescending regression
becomes more oppressive with the adherence to outdated and worn out
instructional rubrics. Inventiveness has for the most part greatly
diminished.
Self-imposed stifling of individuality in sacrifice to the deities of
mass consumption is a part of personal and group consensus to ensure
the perpetuity of material gain. For the majority, status quo reliance
on simplistic consistency does not require imaginative processes of
serious introspection. To be a good worker, to fit into a slot and to
allow pacification into the so called American Dream is the path of
least resistance most desire to follow. Production of sameness,
replicant and robotic imitation reduces the risks of taking leaps out of
the box.
As society regresses to the devolution of contrived extinction, the
arrogance of shallow perspectives spins comforting tales of pabulum
enriched trouble-free mediocrity. From academia to social media, the
reaches of magical thinking for the sustenance of banal conformity
traverses every aspect of human activity. Insipid dumbed down
regurgitations of cinematic remakes comforts the ever burgeoning blather
of juvenile multimedia genre. In movies for instance, not much strain
of "acting" is demanded for American audience to be enthralled by CGI.
Neither academic nor political enterprises strive for ascended
radical departures from "standard operating procedures". Intellectualism
is shunned in favor of feelings. Emotional reactivity attempts to use
force or abuse in the anti-logic of stifling an alternative viewpoint.
By the illogic of immature self-promotion in the neediness of cognitive
bias, many will viciously attack another who dares disagree with the
former claimant perspective. The social imbalance of negativity
permeates daily life from academia to news reporting.
As such, innovative mature thinking processes are thwarted in favor
of the pleasures to be found in various forms of infantile narcissism.
Persistent redundancy in anecdotal sufficiency lazily perpetrates the
speciousness of alleged "scientific" revelation. Swift and certain
actions to quicken the imaginative prospects of change, individuation,
and visionary discovery were long since killed by public educational
templates. Taxonomies, rubrics, and domain competencies pretentiously
masquerade as learning initiatives. Unfortunately data does not support a
positive outlook.
In the superficial realms of movie making, for example, persistent
remakes wallow in the sloppy reliance on technology to entertain, rather
than inspire and educate. Acting remains uncomplicated in the classic
sense for a matters of seconds and then lots of CGI. At the same time,
not expressing much knowledge about much of anything, younger
generations prefer the simplistic to the complex. In trouble-fee
thinking, the scope and depth of deep thinking remains fixated on the
cell phone or the next "fun" thing to do. So, mediocre attempts at
various contemporary art forms, like movies, television, writing, etc.
maintain a "middle school" level mentality.
Unfortunately, in the diverse realms of "arts and entertainment", not
to forget the vast reaches of academia and other societal institutions,
the devolution of creative enterprises hastens social regression. Even
the supposed intellectual bastions of ivory towers, educationally
insulated and protected in sacred fiefdoms, alleged academic research
perpetrates the redundancy of status quo consensus. In the "social
studies" area, as in criminology, sociology and psychology, conventional
textbook blathering often demonstrate the persistence of nothing new
and different. Unproductive replication ensures the unimaginative
consistency in unexciting simplicity.
Any challenges to the time worn theories of the past generally incur
the backlash of those desiring to safeguard the status quo. As one
researcher points out, the American culture is filled with people who
easily accept the ordinariness of unenthusiastic efforts to become
innovative. Little changes over time and place where people are
concerned. While American education is fixated on the same old rubrics,
so called competencies, purported matrices and taxonomies, the
competitive edge continues to slip away. Innovation erodes to boring
complacency.
Pointedly, the lack of serious talent in creativity reverberates
through the many mainstream venues of infotainment. Of recent concern, a
large west coast metropolitan newspaper reported the results of a
ten-year study of American literacy. By comparison, researchers asserted
that reading levels for American adults are significantly lower than
for adults in other countries. Literacy levels were cited as below
average with the U.S. falling behind Scandinavian countries, Japan,
Australia and Korea. Others have offered the critical perspective that
Americans have been mostly "educated" to become reliable workers as
oppose to imaginative and inventive thinkers.
In a faltering state of creativity, with the shallow divisive
atmosphere of murky conjecture, magical thinking and bitter
condescension, the downward trend of negativity actuates the human
species driver toward extinction. Some scientist, the real ones, not the
fake ones, already concluded time is running out for the human race.
For a few, the brave artistic souls, to be creative means freedom. To be
free, is to unleash personal liberation for the hallowed sanctity of
personal enlightenment. Such is a journey to transform oneself into a
better version than original.
With a sense of profound of self-evolving maturity, the ascension to
higher levels of insight comes through a personal quest to become a
well-differentiated individual. Nonetheless, the detractors, the haters,
the inept and incompetent, will harass and plague the existence of each
moment. Some researchers and analysts of natural biological
progressions have suggested humans in general are no longer evolving. In
a physical sense, they are instead devolving.
35 year veteran of the law enforcement community; college professor, author;
You can catch Rick and Bubba on some 70+ stations across the nation.
Some stations carry it live in the mornings, some play the replay back
in the afternoons, some play both! Some even play the replay on Saturdays and Sundays! New stations are being added all the time, so check out Rick and Bubba and take these big boyz with you wherever you go. They'll always have the most up to date information.
