Don't Fall For This Major Cause Of Breast Cancer    These days, we know genetic mutations affect your likelihood of developing breast cancer, especially if you have mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.     But like so many other cancers, diet and lifestyle also play a significant role in whether you'll develop breast cancer. In fact, diet and lifestyle appear to be the biggest factors overall. Researchers now estimate as much as 73 percent of breast cancer is caused by diet and lifestyle choices, as opposed to genetics. That bottle of cola and that dish of ice cream had better be really good because you may end up paying a terrible price.     But lifestyle means far more than our food and exercise habits. It also includes toxins we're exposed to, including some prescription drugs we take because doctors tell us they're "harmless." Right now I'm thinking of the types of hormones you might be putting in your body that could elevate your risk. As Breast Cancer Awareness Month comes to a close, let's take a look at some things you can do... Continued below... Is Cancer a Result of Eating Too Few Apricots?     When it comes to cancer prevention you'd be mad to surrender your health to conventional care. Some so-called experts would have you believe that cancer is caused by an apricot or laetrile (a naturally accruing substance found in the kernels of apricots) deficiency... and that you should eat apricot pits to correct the problem.     Remember, cancer is self-inflicted damage. It comes as a result of our unhealthy lifestyle.     Cancer is not a result of eating too few apricots. 99.9% of native peoples, who are cancer free, do NOT eat apricot kernels. Cancer is not a laetrile deficiency, whatever you may have read about this "cure".     But it is arguably an oxygen deficiency, an anti-oxidant deficiency, electron deficiency, enzyme deficiency, love deficiency and vitamin C and D deficiency. Even, our standard Western diet contributes to cancer.     You can find out the REAL cancer secrets from the collected writings of an experienced holistic physician, with over 30 years experience.     Click here to discover scientifically-proven cancer therapies and get wise about cancer before it strikes. 5 "little" lifestyle tips that can help you Avoid breast cancer     Lifestyle choices can have a profound affect on your health, and on how your body performs at all levels. Doctors rarely spend the time necessary to talk about these things. Be smart today, and implement this "top 5" list. Smoking and Alcohol. If you smoke, quit as soon as possible. Studies show that women who smoked for 35 years had a 60% greater risk of serious breast health problems. And women who smoked 15 years were 34% more likely to develop abnormal breast cells. As for alcohol, drinking the stuff on a regular basis may fuel estrogen imbalances and abnormal breast cell changes. As the rest of this article will show, high estrogen levels are a major cause of breast cancer and other cancers. Exercise. Even mild or moderate exercise (i.e., 30 minutes of walking) can help move immune cells around your body, support a healthy estrogen balance, and help keep abnormal breast cells from taking root. It also promotes insulin sensitivity and a healthy weight. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Walk a little bit — ten minutes, 15 minutes. DO SOMETHING. Your Weight. Fat cells produce more estrogen. A healthy weight also benefits your cardiovascular, metabolic, and overall health. Yes, I know everyone's tired of being nagged, but the years this can add to your life are worth all the trouble of tackling this problem. Vegetables. Eat a diet high in organic veggies, especially cruciferous and dark leafy greens. They're chock full of crucial vitamins, antioxidants, and phytochemicals you've probably never heard of. Raw is better than cooked. Thermography and breast exams. Do monthly self-breast exams and an annual thermogram. A thermogram doesn't directly diagnose cancer, but it can warn you of inflammatory hot spots that can spell trouble, up to ten years in advance of actually having cancer that can be detected. This gives you tons of time to take action. Meanwhile, beware of this mainstream medical therapy     It's widely documented that hormone replacement therapy increases the risk of breast cancer. Not so many years ago, doctors promoted this therapy like crazy. Nearly half of all post-menopausal women at least gave it a try — that's a staggering number of people.     Then a big study revealed that hormone replacement therapy was clearly linked to breast cancer. It turned out it was a really bad idea to blindly trust your doctor — you know, that guy or gal who has all that schooling and knows everything.     Thousands of women promptly quit hormone replacement therapy, and within a few years the breast cancer rate plunged.     It was probably the most dramatic proof ever seen that a lifestyle choice can give you cancer. In this case the choice was a prescription drug that is not essential.     In spite of the warnings, it seems quite a few women still take hormone replacement therapy. If that describes you, take heed — you're putting your life in danger. And that may be true even if you're a loyal natural health fan and take "bio-identical" hormone therapy, as I'll explain in a minute. What is hormone replacement therapy?     Conventional hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after menopause is a lifestyle choice and it's something women have been choosing for decades, although far fewer women choose it now. It's also known as menopausal hormone therapy (HT or MHT), postmenopausal hormones (PMH), or postmenopausal hormone therapy (PHT). Treatments are generally administered through a pill, topical cream, or patch.     Most conventional hormone replacement therapy is made up of progesterone or progestins (synthetic hormones that act like progesterone). In rare cases, androgens (testosterone-like male hormones) are used, along with something called Tibolone, a synthetic hormone drug that acts like estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone, depending on which tissue of the body it gets put into to.     Women choose HRT to replace the female hormones in their bodies that are no longer made after menopause (in general, that's when women have lower estrogen levels). But it's a choice that can dramatically increase your breast cancer risk as well as your risk of other cancers, even if you use it for as little as two years.     Before the big study linking it to cancer, HRT used to be a standard treatment for any woman who experienced hot flashes or other menopausal symptoms, and was believed to have long-term benefits that protected against illness like heart disease and dementia. Now we know the treatment did more harm than good, especially for older post-menopausal women.     In spite of this finding, HRT is still considered a helpful treatment for certain groups of women, such as those at high risk of heart disease (this is because some studies show estrogen may decrease heart disease risk). But it's not clear whether the benefits outweigh the risks even for these special groups. Why the HRT cancer risk is real     As more research on HRT surfaces, more risks are coming to light. For example, women who take estrogen supplements without the right balance of progesterone risk uterine cancer. Breast cancer risk also rises, in part because HRT can cause a breast to look denser on a mammogram, making cancer all but impossible to detect.     Worse still, not only does hormone replacement therapy elevate your risk of breast cancer, but once developed, the cancer might be more aggressive. Meaning the cancer might be more advanced once discovered, thus increasing your risk of dying from the disease.     Doctors caution that if you have a current or past history of breast, ovarian, or endometrial cancer, you should steer clear of HRT—a fact that underscores how much hormone replacement therapy supports the growth of cancer.     Here's a sampling of some recent negative results from HRT supplementation: One study of women taking estrogen-only therapy showed that one in nine women who took the therapy for three years developed a pre-cancerous change in the lining of the uterus. In a Women's Health Initiative study (WHI), those who took estrogen-progestin therapy had a higher risk of breast cancer. And the longer the hormones were used, the higher the risk. In this study, it took three years of halting hormone therapy for risk levels to return to normal. In the same WHI study, it was found that women on estrogen-progestin therapy actually had a lower risk of colorectal cancer, but the cancers they did get were more likely to spread to lymph nodes or distant sites. Observational studies suggest that estrogen-progestin therapy slightly increases the risk of ovarian cancer.     In general, your risk returns to normal within five years of stopping hormone replacement therapy. What about natural alternatives to drug-company hormone replacement therapy?     The first step to getting off hormone replacement therapy is to gradually minimize the amount you take. Use the lowest dose possible to treat your symptoms, and focus on improving other aspects of your health—by following the five tips at the beginning of this article.     Limiting stress is also an effective way to help curb menopausal symptoms. Take up yoga or practice relaxed, deep breathing or meditation. Tai chi and acupuncture may also help.     An alternative is to take bio-identical hormone replacement therapy, which appears to have a higher satisfaction rate. For example, those patients who take bio-identical hormone replacement therapy with progesterone report higher satisfaction than those who take a synthetic progestin. Same case for those taking Estriol, a bio-identical form of estrogen, which reacts within the body differently than estrogens found in conventional hormone replacement therapy. The latter are not exactly the same as the natural hormones your own body manufactures.     It makes sense to me that bio-identical hormones would be safer, but even so this type of therapy remains controversial. Having spent years recommending the man-made hormones, mainstream medicine has now done a complete about face and says ANY estrogen supplement — man-made or bio-identical -- may increase cancer risk.     I am anything but an expert, but I do know that exposure to estrogen does raise cancer risk. For this reason, the more pregnancies a woman has, the lower her breast cancer risk, because estrogen levels drop during pregnancy. Breast cancer risk is directly related to the number of monthly cycles a woman has during her lifetime, since estrogen levels peak during a certain part of the cycle. Pregnancy arrests this process and leads to lower cumulative lifetime exposure to estrogen.     I've also read (and, again, I'm not an expert) that the symptoms of menopause can be managed by diet and proper food supplements. Doctors who advocate this approach say that the annoying symptoms of modern menopause are largely a product of our bad dietary habits. Like other symptoms of aging including diabetes and heart disease, we're inflicting this problem on ourselves. In the end ... avoid the risk     Controlled trials are needed before we have more conclusive results about the risks of hormone replacement therapy, but for now, it appears much safer to go with what's natural. Especially since every time researchers learn more about hormone therapy, the message seems to be that it's not that great after all.     So as long as there are alternatives, your best bet is to try them first. References: "Association Between Hormone Replacement Therapy Use and Breast Cancer Risk Varies." By Science News forScience Daily, 3 September 2013. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/09/130903193926.htm "Breast Cancer: Reducing Your Risk." Whole Health Insider. Issue from 3 October 2013. http://www.wholehealthinsider.com/newsletter/breast-cancer-reducing-risk-2/ "Hormone therapy: Is it right for you?" By Mayo Clinic staff: Menopause section, Mayo Clinic. Viewed 9 Oct 2013. http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/hormone-therapy/WO00046 "Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Cancer Risk." American Cancer Society: Medical Treatments. Viewed 9 October 2013. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/othercarcinogens/medicaltreatments/menopausal-hormone -replacement-therapy-and-cancer-risk

Health Disclaimer: The information provided above is not intended as personal medical advice or instructions. You should not take any action affecting your health without consulting a qualified health professional. The authors and publishers of the information above are not doctors or health-caregivers. The authors and publishers believe the information to be accurate but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. There is some risk associated with ANY cancer treatment, and the reader should not act on the information above unless he or she is willing to assume the full risk. Reminder: You're getting this email because you purchased a special report or book from us, or signed up for our free newsletter and gave us permission to contact you. From time to time we'll alert you to other important information about alternative cancer treatments. If you want to update or remove your email address, please scroll down to the bottom of this page and click on the appropriate link. We're an online cancer bookstore offering Outsmart Your Cancer, Cancer Step Outside the Box, Stop Cancer Before It Starts, Natural Cancer Remedies that Work, Adios-Cancer, Cancer Breakthrough USA, Missing Ingredient For Good Health, German Cancer Breakthrough, How to Cure Almost Any Cancer for $5.15 a Day and Keep Your Gallbladder!

The Cancer Story that Shook America by Andrew Scholberg     This is the first of two reports about the Doctors' Symposium of the Cancer Control Society, September 3, 2013, Sheraton Universal Hotel, Universal City, California     One of the most compelling speakers at the Cancer Control Society's 2013 Doctors' Symposium was a remarkable cancer survivor named Billy Best. He told a dramatic story of taking responsibility for your own treatment. . .and getting well. Keep reading... Continued below... Cancer Cells Killed by Eating This...     There is a nutrient in your kitchen, right now, that acts like a "smart bomb" against cancer cells.     It's one of the main phytonutrients in a specific type of food. Researchers are hailing it as a breakthrough that offers real hope for preventing and defeating cancer.     A new research study has shown how it can selectively target and kill cancer cells, while leaving healthy cells alone. The findings are breakthrough for its potential use in cancer prevention and treatment.     But this is just the tip of the iceberg. There's also:     - A natural cholesterol fighter that brings bad levels down 30%;     - An effective method to lowering your blood pressure without harmful drugs;     - A fruit that can fight Alzheimer's Disease;     Dr. Victor Marchione, aka the Food Doctor is revealing this and 16 other amazing "healing foods" in his newest report that you can see here.     Nearly 20 years ago, when Billy was a teenager, he came down with Hodgkin's lymphoma. His parents, desperate to save the life of their son, relied on their doctor's recommendation that chemotherapy was the appropriate treatment. They knew nothing about alternative treatment options.     After the fifth round of treatment, Billy's tumors were shrinking. But the chemo made him feel as if any more chemo would kill him. Billy decided he was through with chemotherapy; he would rather let the cancer kill him than the chemo. But his doctor wouldn't take no for an answer. He told Billy and his parents that quitting was not an option. Billy would have to continue taking chemo whether he wanted to or not. Doctor causes Billy to run away from home     The doctor sternly warned: "Unless you do chemo and radiation, you'll be dead in two years!"     But Billy had made up his mind. Chemotherapy made him sick, and he knew the doctor was giving him poison. That made no sense to him. Because his doctor insisted that he continue with the treatment, Billy felt he had no choice but to run away from home -- and that's what he did.     Before running away, Billy left a note to his parents. It said, "I love you. My leaving has nothing to do with you. I just can't go back to the hospital for more chemotherapy."     Billy decided to go to Texas, where he hid out for a couple of weeks. His running away to avoid chemotherapy made the news headlines nationwide. Through the news media, Billy's parents pleaded for him to return. They said, "You don't have to do chemo if you come home. So just come home." He got the message and came home to die of cancer.     When Billy got home, he started getting letters from all over America. People who'd heard about his plight wrote to him, recommending various alternative cancer treatments and home remedies.     All that Billy knew about nutrition was Flintstones vitamins. In reading through the letters, he quickly got up to speed on the things he could do to improve his nutrition. He organized the huge stack of letters by subject, studied the letters, and gained confidence that he could get rid of his cancer without chemo or radiation.     Billy's new treatment plan started with nutrition. He decided to cut out meat, dairy, flour, and sugar. He ate locally grown organic food as much as possible. Then he added Essiac tea, a Native American anti-cancer herbal remedy that originated in Canada. And he decided to use one other therapy: 714X, which directly treats the lymphatic system. He learned how to inject 714X directly into his lymph nodes. Doctor reports Billy's parents to the authorities     When Billy's doctor found out about his "quack" treatment plan, he reported Billy's parents to the authorities. But the authorities declined to put Billy into foster care or to force him to return to chemotherapy, on the grounds that Billy was nearly of legal age and had lived on his own during his time in Texas.     So Billy continued to eat organic food, drink Essiac tea, and give himself the 714X shots. And that was enough to get rid of his cancer. The editors of this newsletter have no personal experience with 714X and this is the first case study we've encountered. The remedy, however, is well known. It's possible that one, two or all three of the therapies Billy chose were responsible for his recovery.     Because of the publicity about Billy's running away from home, his recovery from cancer by natural means caused a media sensation. He went on TV and appeared on such popular programs as "Good Morning America." Everyone was interested in his story. (This was before the drug companies started sponsoring news broadcasts. Now that the drug companies sponsor so many television and radio programs, a story like Billy's is much less likely to be publicized in mainstream news outlets.)     Suddenly, Billy started getting letters from people asking for his advice on how to get rid of their cancer. Ironically, just a short time earlier he had known nothing about the subject and was getting advice from others. Now other people considered him the authority and were asking for his advice. He was glad to help others in any way he could.     Eighteen years ago, Billy stood at the podium of the annual Cancer Control Convention and told the audience his story. He also wrote a book, The Billy Best Story: Beating Cancer with Alternative Medicine. Incidentally, Billy said the man who helped him find 714X was thrown into prison. The government frowns on alternative treatments such as 714X and much prefers that cancer patients get chemo and radiation. "Is the prostate cancer like a pitbull or a poodle?"     Another speaker at this year's Cancer Control Society convention made a big impression. One of America's top alternative doctors for prostate cancer is Phranq Tamburri, N.M.D. The three initials stands for Naturopathic Medical Doctor. Dr. Tamburri is the director of a clinic in Phoenix, Arizona, where he sees cancer patients from all over the world.     Dr. Tamburri emphasized that when it comes to cancer treatment, one size does NOT fit all. He customizes the cancer treatment for each patient, based on what he observes about the patient and the cancer. His strategy for treating cancer depends on the character of the individual case.     Dr. Tamburri said, "Don't just nuke the cancer the minute you see it. If you saw a tiger in your back yard, you'd shoot it. But if you take a safari and watch tigers in their natural surroundings, they yawn, they stretch, and do other such things. You get to observe them. At our practice we observe the cancer to see how it is. Is your cancer a pitbull or a poodle? No test will tell you that. When a patient flies in, we do a three-hour assessment with him so we can assess where he is on the bell curve."     As for the PSA test to detect the presence of prostate tumors, Dr. Tamburri said the larger a man's prostate is, the higher his PSA number can go even though the gland is still normal. Cell phones are safe, right?     Another CCS speaker, author Elizabeth Plourde, talked about the subject of pollution from EMF (electro magnetic frequency) devices such as cell phones, Wi-Fi routers, smart meters, and so on. Most Americans don't think twice about the safety of cell phones and other such devices because they are approved by the U.S. government and, therefore, must be safe -- or so people think.     The only problem with that rationale is that the U.S. government also approved the drug Vioxx, which killed more Americans than the Vietnam War before it was pulled from the market. From FDA to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, government agencies don't test products for long-term safety or toxicity. If the product doesn't cause you to keel over within a day or two, it's deemed safe. But cancer arises — sometimes decades later -- from long-term exposure to toxins or radiation.     Europeans are more concerned about the potential dangers of EMF pollution. Plourde said that England has a 12-month moratorium on smart meters, and Germany is considering a moratorium. Sweden has called EMF pollution "the largest biological experiment perpetrated on the human race." A European council called for dramatic reduction in EMF exposure, urging the public to take all reasonable measures to reduce exposure to electromagnetic fields.     According to Plourde, teenagers and children who spent lots of time with a cell phone next to the ear are particularly vulnerable to brain damage.     While many people seem to tolerate EMF pollution with no apparent difficulty, Plourde said that some people, such as herself, can't tolerate it at all. She called herself "the canary in the coal mine" because she's so sensitive to it. For example, when smart meters were installed in her neighborhood, she noticed an itchy rash on her ankle right away. The itch spread to her knee and then up her thigh. Before long she had a head-to-toe rash. The itch was insane. Soon she had itchy bloody sores. Nothing helped very much -- not even cortisone cream.     The only thing that helped was a product line of "DOTs" she found from a source in England that somehow neutralizes the EMF pollution. The products include a bioDOT for personal protection, an electroDOT for cell phones and other such devices, and a Wi-FiDOT for routers, smart meters, and other high output devices. Plourde says she wouldn't be able to function without these protective products.     A skeptic might attribute her improvement to the placebo effect. But Plourde said that a dog that had previously been tranquil started pacing back and forth at night when a smart meter was installed. The owner put a bioDOT on the dog's collar, whereupon the dog stopped pacing. The placebo effect wouldn't explain the dog's improvement.     Plourde listed some of the symptoms of EMF pollution, including headaches, vertigo, skin rashes, insomnia, brain fog, blurred vision, tinnitus, shortness of breath, nausea, heart palpitations, irritability, nerve pain, muscle pain, and food allergies.     She added that EMF chaos may also be a factor in other diseases such as Alzheimer's and autism. She recommends two basic strategies for dealing with EMF pollution: (1) returning to wired technology instead of wireless, or (2) using devices that neutralize the effect of the EMF chaos.

This common food is a powerful germ-killer

Tap into the Healing Power of Honey     Whether you add it to your tea or spread it on a piece of bread, you might be one of many folks who enjoy honey as a sweet treat for your taste buds.     But ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Romans and others knew something else: This sticky bee product can be a valuable medicine, too!     India's 4000-year-old Ayurveda tradition identifies honey as a valuable medicine for ALL body imbalances. Fast forward to the 21st century and you'll find quite a few champions of honey as a healer in our own times, too. Let's take a look at a recent discovery that might have special value for cancer patients... Continued below... 3 Toxic Snack Foods That You Must Stay Away From     In a world where you're always on the go, it can be difficult to prepare a snack that is wholesome from home and you end up turning to convenience snacks along the way - ones that you can quickly grab and put in your purse or desk at work.     Snacking can be a part of healthy diet plan and can help you achieve optimal energy levels throughout the day while keeping your blood sugar levels more stabilized, but, if you're not careful with the snack choices you're choosing, you could be doing far more harm than good.     Here are three toxic snack foods that you should do away with immediately.     1 single flat belly tip that you didn't know <= click here       1. Processed Cheese       2. Chips and Crackers       3. Energy Bars     Click here to find out why you need to eliminate them from your dietimmediately!!!     The discovery originates with New Zealand biochemist Peter Molan, who works at the Honey Research Unit at the University of Waikato. He focuses on the remarkable healing properties of a specific type of honey.     Dr. Molan believes the flowers of the native New Zealand manuka bush produce honey with antibacterial properties head and shoulders above other products.     Let me explain what it is about manuka honey that makes it such a promising treatment—even for cancer patients with wounds to heal. Manuka honey's got that 'special something…'     European honey bees produce this outstanding health elixir by extracting nectar from the manuka or tea tree. This flowering plant in the myrtle family is native to New Zealand and southeast Australia.     An enzyme that bees add to the nectar produces hydrogen peroxide in all honeys. Dr. Molan said that manuka honey—and its close relative which is made from the Australia jellybush—contains a little extra something…     But after more than two decades of research, Molan still couldn't say just what that special something is. He decided to call it the unique manuka factor (UMF).     Another researcher, Professor Thomas Henle form the Institute of Food Chemistry at the Technical University of Dresden, Germany, determined that the extra 'kick' in manuka honey comes from methylglyoxal (MG).     Small amounts of MG are in most types of honey. In manuka honey, MG comes from the conversion of dihydroxyacetone—which is found in higher concentration in the nectar of manuka flowers.     So maybe it's that extra MG that makes manuka honey such a strong antibacterial.     According to Dr. Molan, when he compares the bacteria fighting ability of the UMF in manuka honey to other carbolic or phenol antiseptics, the results are nothing short of amazing. Manuka honey makes the toughest bacteria run for cover!     Medical professionals are finding that even the toughest new strains of antibiotic-resistant bacteria don't stand a chance when they're treated with manuka honey.     Superbugs such as the dreaded Staphylococcus aureas and its evil cousin MRSA are no match for this amazing natural antibiotic.     A group of Canadian researchers published findings in the journal Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery, which concluded that manuka honey has "bactericidal properties superior to those of most commonly used antimicrobials."     Similarly, a 2002 review found that despite the small number of clinical studies on living patients (in vivo), the antibacterial properties of manuka and other honeys had been demonstrated in studies of lab cultures (in vitro).     These reviewers concluded that there was a potential for its use in "the management of a large number of wound types."     Dr. Molan is quoted in a BBC News interview as saying, "We know it has a very broad spectrum of action… we haven't found anything it doesn't work on among infectious organisms." So what did the Egyptians know that we're just finding out?     Ancient writings show that honey was commonly used as a type of healing ointment for open wounds and sores.     Its natural antibiotic properties helped keep the wounds from becoming infected—which could also lead to other health problems. For many years I've heard authorities in natural medicine recommend honey as a wound dressing to prevent infection. It appears that manuka may be quite a bit more powerful than the average honey.     Manuka honey is being touted as a marvelous all-purpose medicine that can help: Heal surgical wounds, particularly for diabetic patients. Improve superficial burns Stop uncomfortable inflammation in its tracks Treat leg ulcers, pressure sores and wounds from cancers that break through skin And much more!     Even the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agrees that honey could be a simple and effective treatment to help injured persons.     Believe it or not, the FDA approved manuka honey as a wound management treatment in 2007.     And you better believe that watchful entrepreneurs got their wagons rolling not long after this decision…     For example, the New Jersey company Derma Sciences Inc., a maker of advanced wound care products, started selling the first honey-based dressings in the U.S.     Their product is called Medihoney. It's made from a highly absorbent seaweed-based material saturated with manuka honey.     Dr. Molan also developed wound dressings that are marketed by the New Zealand companyComvita.     These dressings could be especially helpful to cancer patients who experience wounds or ulcers as a result of radiation therapy.     But if you're not in the market for wound dressings — don't despair! There are other manuka honey products available from reputable companies. For example, you'll find manuka honey oil, throat spray, lozenges and other products marketed by Manuka Health-New Zealand (http://www.manukahoneyus.com/ ).     See what kind of protection and sweet relief you experience by discovering the power of this ancient health remedy! Resources: Alandejani, T. et al. Effectiveness of honey on Staphylococcus aureusand Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery. (2009) 141, 114-118. Available at http://www.metroatlantaotolaryngology.org/journal/nov10/biofilms%20and%20honey.pdf Dunford, C. et al. The use of honey in healing of multiply infected skin lesions following meningococcal septicaemia. Knox,, A. 2004. Harnessing honey's healing power. BBC News. Available online at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3787867.stm Lusby, PE; Coombes, A, Wilkinson, JM (2002 Nov). "Honey: a potent agent for wound healing?" Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing: official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society / WOCN 29 (6): 295-300. doi:10.1067/mjw.2002.129073. PMID 12439453 Moczulski, J.P. 2007. Honey making a medical comeback. NBC News. Article available at http://www.nbcnews.com/id/22398921/

2103 Cancer Control Society Convention

41st Annual
Cancer Control Society 
 2013 Convention

OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND PROFESSIONALS
Aug. 31st Sept 1 & 2, 2013
Sat., Sun. & Mon. - Labor Day Weekend
SHERATON UNIVERSAL HOTEL
Universal City, CA (Across from Universal Studios Hollywood)
For Hotel Reservations Call 1-800-325-3535 - Say Attending “CCS Convention”
Singles and Doubles $155.00
Meet Recovered Cancer Patients with Encouraging Reports
LECTURES . MOVIES . EXHIBITS

LEARN ABOUT THE PREVENTION & CONTROL OF CANCER THROUGH NUTRITION, TESTS & NON-TOXIC CANCER THERAPIES SUCH AS LAETRILE, GERSON, HOXSEY, KOCH, ENZYMES & IMMUNOTHERAPY FROM MEDICAL DOCTORS, CLINICAL RESEARCHERS, NUTRITIONISTS & AUTHORS. IN ADDITION, LEARN ABOUT CHELATION, DMSO, OXYGEN, HERBAL, CELLULAR &
ELECTRO-MAGNETIC THERAPIES. AND MUCH MORE…

Only $40.00/Day

For more information and programs contact:
CANCER CONTROL SOCIETY
2043 N. Berendo St.
Los Angeles, CA 90027 
(323) 663-7801
www.cancercontrolsociety.com 
DOCTOR'S Symposium - $75.00
Tuesday, Sept. 3rd - ALL PROFESSIONALS & PUBLIC INVITED.
TOUR OF MEXICAN CANCER CLINICS - $100.00
Wed., Sept. 4th, Sat., Sept. 14 
PRE-REGISTRATION

Cure deadly breast cancer with oxygen!?

Cure One of TheDeadliest Breast Cancers
With Oxygen!?

A breast surgeon laughed at
this safe home treatment , until
it saved his wife’s life when no scalpel could...

It’s a remarkable story that most breast cancer surgeons would rather not hear....

While they’re telling women that breast removal surgery is a must to survive breast cancer, there’s one breast cancer surgeon who sings a different tune.

This doctor experienced a stunning change of heart after a double mastectomy—removal of both breasts—failed his own wife. Her cancer came back and they were told it was “hopeless.”

The treatment she agreed to next wasn’t chemotherapy or radiation (she’d already tried those, and they didn’t heal her cancer either!) but a treatment he never learned about in medical school...

What saved her life was an all-natural oxygen therapy available without a prescription and backed by six decades of research—including studies in major medical journals—and thousands of success stories.

To his amazement it actually worked...

Watch this free video to see the proof for one easy treatment that’s so safe you can use it at home for a fraction of the cost of surgery, chemotherapy or radiation. This breakthrough discovery is bringing countless women with breast cancer back from death’s door.

Click here to watch the video now!

Breast Cancer Cover-Up

Did a Leading Cancer Doctor Really Admit This?

If you asked oncologists what they really think of cancer treatments, you’d be shocked.

According to one report, when a leading doctor at the Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center found out that he had advanced‐stage cancer, he told his colleagues, “Do anything you want—but no chemotherapy!”

And he’s not alone. Another official reportedly refused to allow his mother to undergo “state‐of‐the‐art” therapy at his own hospital. What did he do? He sent her to Germany for “alternative” care.

But it’s not surprising when you consider the side effects of traditional treatment...hair loss, nausea, fatigue, cancer even!

So then why wouldn’t you hear more about a natural treatment? One that not only destroys cancer cells but leaves healthy ones untouched?

A study on people who received this treatment for cancer and other ailments noted that “the results have been spectacular; the only side effect is ‘chronic good health.’” 

You read that correctly. Chronic good health was the only side effect. That’s a far cry from any of the conventional methods you’ll hear about.

Go HERE to find out all the details including how the mainstream almost killed one of the greatest cancer discoveries in history. Prepare to be outraged.

German Cancer Breakthrough

Just say no to this dangerous test

X-rays are a major cause of cancer     We Americans are the most over-X-rayed people on earth, and the heavy doses of radiation we get are a major, and growing, cause of cancer. A British study suggests nearly one percent of all cancer cases in the United States (0.9 percent, to be exact) are due to diagnostic X-rays. That's a full 50 percent more than in the UK, where about 0.6 percent of cancers are caused by doctors taking pictures. The Brits don't subject patients to as many X-rays as we do.     Doctors, of course, would have us believe the benefits of X-rays outweigh the "small" increase in risk. One cancer out of a hundred may not sound like much, but just imagine if, say, a supplement like C0Q10 were found to be the cause of one percent of all cancers. It would be pulled off the shelves so fast your head would spin, and there would be no talk of balancing the dangers with the benefits (which happen to be enormous for this supplement).     What does radiation do to you? Let's take a look... Continued below... Flip Your Body's Energy Switch to "ON"     Without Caffeine, Sugar, Herbal Stimulants or that Tropical Vacation You Don't Have Time For...     If you're feeling tired and sluggish too often ... lacking your old pep and enthusiasm ... and relying on caffeine, energy drinks or sugary snacks to make it through the day...     There is now a PROVEN, NATURAL SOLUTION that takes care of all of your energy problems so you.... Wake up well-rested and hop out of bed Walk, bicycle, play tennis or golf with energy left over Wipe away brain fog and think clearly with sharper focus Increase your stamina and endurance throughout the day Feel more alive than you have in decades!     PLUS: Support balanced blood sugar and blood pressure... maintain a slim waistline... reignite your sex drive... and feel happier and healthier than you have in decades!     Learn More in this FREE Special Report We're in the middle of an X-ray epidemic     American medicine has gone X-ray crazy. The total amount of X-radiation we receive went upsix times from 1990 to 2006, according to the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement (2009, Report 160).     The New England Journal of Medicine says CT scans alone account for half the medical imaging dose we get. The article estimates that CT scans cause something like four out of every thousand cancers (Issue 357). The number of patients getting very high doses doubled every yearfrom 1996 to 2010, says the Journal of the American Medical Association.     A recent study of people who had cancer when they were children demonstrates the dangers of radiation. More than 95 percent of them suffered from chronic health problems by the time they were 45, including lung, hearing and heart problems.     You see, radiation damage is long term and shows up decades later. As Dr. Melissa Hudson, one of the study's authors, puts it, "Doctors may not be thinking about a heart-valve disorder in someone in his 30s, but if you had radiation to your chest at 10, this is something to think about."     The findings, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, are based on detailed physicals conducted on 1,700 adults who were treated for cancer at St. Jude's Children's Research Hospital in Memphis from ten to 40 years ago.     The researchers found that the parts of the body treated then are precisely the ones that are falling apart now. There's strong evidence that conventional cancer treatments accelerate the aging process of organs. The damage is profound, but it's not evident right away.     Adult survivors who received radiation to the brain as children suffer from thinking and memory problems typical of much older people. Those who were subjected to chest X-rays are likely to have heart-valve changes, including scarring and leaky valves. For this group of people whose average age was 33, "the health problems were considered striking" (the Wall Street Journal'schoice of words, not mine.)     These people were cancer survivors — you could argue their treatment was successful. But two points are worth making. One is that alternative treatments could have done the job gently, with no damage, instead of the lifetime health problems these young people now face. There are something like 395,000 childhood cancer survivors in our country. This is a vast tragedy.     The second point is that those of us who just receive routine diagnostic X-rays — not cancer treatment — face similar risks. Everyday X-rays and your risk of cancer     To be fair, the doses of radiation used to treat cancer patients are vastly great than those you receive in diagnostic X-rays. But X-ray damage is permanent and cumulative, so all those "little, routine" X-rays add up. Once the damage is done, it never goes away. And each time you have another X-ray, you add to it. Given the escalating use of X-rays in our medical system, the problem can only get worse.     When I was young, I had many chronic health problems myself and received tons of X-rays, so this is personal with me. The X-rays never turned up anything useful. The results were always negative. The problems I was trying to solve — chronic headaches, chronic body pain and fatigue, terrible GI-tract upset, unhealthy skin — were all eventually solved by alternative medicine.     My health problems were mostly due to the Standard American Diet (SAD), consisting of sugar and other refined carbs, hormone-and-drug-fed beef and chicken, heaven knows what preservatives and other chemicals, over-cooked vegetables, no fiber and a desperate lack of nutrients. X-rays were never going to identify any of those problems, but if you walk into a doctor's office with head pain or back pain or intestinal problems, you're probably going to get an X-ray.     I have plenty of company when it comes to being over-X-rayed. It's normal, and the consequences are a disaster. A study sponsored by the National Cancer Institute found, for example, that women who had had an average of 25 back X-rays had a 70 percent greater risk of dying of breast cancer than the general population. If you think nobody ever has 25 X-rays, ask a friend with long-term chronic pain. I had four back X-rays that I can remember, maybe more.     A recent study at the University of Hong Kong found that the risk of soft-tissue sarcoma is doubled if a person receives an amount of radiation equivalent to two CT head scans. One of the study's authors, Dr. Dino Samartzis, said, "The study has highlighted that even low to moderate levels of exposure are enough to cause genetic mutation."     Yup, I had a brain scan, too, for those mystery headaches I used to have, plus a full set of sinus X-rays.     In one recent year, 2008, a study found that 1.65 million children received a CT scan during a visit to an emergency room — five times as many as in 1994. A CT scan is equivalent to three to seven years of absorption of the amount of radiation we get naturally from the environment — all packed into a few minutes. A child exposed to just two or three scans faces three times the risk of developing brain cancer later in life.     A couple of years ago, TV star Dr. Mehmet Oz set off a mini panic when he noted that thyroid cancer is the fastest-growing cancer in women. As one of the causes he cited the harmful effects of radiation from sources like dental X-rays and mammograms.     Thyroid cancer is pretty rare. It accounts for only about 3 cancers out a hundred in women. It's also highly treatable and nearly everyone who gets it survives. But who needs any kind of cancer? Your dentist should X-ray no more than one or two of your teeth a year. If he's doing a full X-ray every year, get a new dentist.     One of the strongest voices against our X-ray mania was the late Dr. John Gofman, M.D., Ph.D. and Professor at the University of California at Berkeley. He wrote six books on the effects of ionizing radiation on health, his last title being Radiation from Medical Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease. In this 700-page tome, he presented strong evidence that medical X-rays not only play an important role in causing half of all cancer cases, but also cause 60 percent of heart disease cases.     X-rays are not the only causes of these diseases (see my previous comments about diet) but they are major causes. Preventing cancer is the fine art of trimming your exposure a little bit here and a little bit there, wherever you have the opportunity. Never say, "It's just one little X-ray" — especially if you've already dozens during your life up to this point.     Sometimes you need an X-ray to diagnose a medical problem, but they should generally be avoided and resisted. This newsletter is on record against mammograms, the most common unnecessary (and largely useless) use of X-rays. Consider thermography. It's a better way to diagnose breast cancer.     When a doctor urges (or orders) an X-ray, ask whether an MRI or ultrasound is possible instead. These diagnostic tests involve no radiation at all. Refuse X-rays that are part of a general physical "just to make sure everything's all right." If you don't have any symptoms, why have an X-ray?     One thing that's under your control is your exposure to natural radiation from radon. Check your home and, if possible, your work place to ensure you're not being irradiated every day without even knowing it. As bad as medical X-rays are, radon accounts for an enormous portion of the public's exposure to radiation. 21,000 lung cancer deaths a year are attributed to radon, second only to smoking.

Health Disclaimer: The information provided above is not intended as personal medical advice or instructions. You should not take any action affecting your health without consulting a qualified health professional. The authors and publishers of the information above are not doctors or health-caregivers. The authors and publishers believe the information to be accurate but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. There is some risk associated with ANY cancer treatment, and the reader should not act on the information above unless he or she is willing to assume the full risk. Reminder: You're getting this email because you purchased a special report or book from us, or signed up for our free newsletter and gave us permission to contact you. From time to time we'll alert you to other important information about alternative cancer treatments. If you want to update or remove your email address, please scroll down to the bottom of this page and click on the appropriate link. We're an online cancer bookstore offering Outsmart Your Cancer, Cancer Step Outside the Box, Stop Cancer Before It Starts, Natural Cancer Remedies that Work, Adios-Cancer, Cancer Breakthrough USA, Missing Ingredient For Good Health, German Cancer Breakthrough, How to Cure Almost Any Cancer for $5.15 a Day and Keep Your Gallbladder!

Don't let cancer kill your bank account

Treating Cancer Is FINANCIALLY Toxic!     The diagnosis is devastating... the treatments doctors recommend can be traumatic...     ... and when the bills start rolling in—you quickly realize that the cost of curing cancer is just about as bad as the disease! Here's what cancer does to your bank account, and what you can do about it... Continued below... The 8-Ingredient Recipe For Radically Transformed Health     How would you like to trade your body for a healthier, more youthful one?     By doing just ONE thing differently, you can...     Heal your diseases... banish aches and pains... sleep like a baby... and restore your youthful energy...     Age backwards... put an end to grey hair... improve your vision... and reduce wrinkles—without cosmetic dermatologists, eye doctors, plastic surgeons, and hair colorists...     Lose weight... improve muscle tone and skin elasticity... and recover your youthful physique.     Click here to claim your FREE REPORT and discover this amazing little-known secret—and radically transform your health.     A recent study1 indicates that cancer patients are three times more likely to declare bankruptcy than people without the disease.     According to a June 2013 study from the Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research in Washington, younger people with cancer were five times more likely to declare bankruptcy compared to older patients.     Those odds are alarming when you consider that tough economic times have driven bankruptcies sky high for people who aren't dealing with a cancer diagnosis!     Study co-author Karma Kreizenbeck says that while their paper shows how cancer causes patients to run up medical debts that can lead to bankruptcy, "it could also mean people have to take second jobs, end up with lower credit scores or have to make other decisions."     If you're wondering about the numbers, consider this estimate from the National Cancer Institute (NCI)2 ...     According to their research, cancer costs in 2010 reached a staggering $124 billion in the United States. And you can bet these numbers will continue their upward trend, with some estimates of cancer costs reaching at least $158 billion by 2020.     If you're already emotionally and physically exhausted from dealing with disease, the last thing you need is the stress of worrying about how to pay for treatments.     But that's the unfortunate reality for thousands of sick cancer patients. Let's take a look at some of the costs you can expect to face… A surefire way to drain your bank account     Cancer.net, a website of cancer information from American Society of Clinical Oncology, breaks down some of the common costs associated with cancer. These include: Doctor appointments—Even when you have medical insurance, you typically are responsible for a co-payment for each visit. The amount of the co-pay is set by the insurance company and can really add up when visits are frequent. What's more, you'll often be on the hook for separate charges associated with each laboratory test done as part of your appointment. Treatment expenses—These include charges for any medical care, such as radiation and chemotherapy sessions, that you receive during your cancer treatment. A study from Duke University Medical Center and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute3 showed that 215 insured cancer patients reported spending an average of $712 a month in out-of-pocket expenses. And even insured women with breast cancer can expect to shell out anywhere from $150-200 weekly for radiology visits if they have high insurance co-pays! Because cancer treatment can take anywhere from a few days to months or years—you'll need a doctor or nurse to help you determine how often and for how long you may incur these out-of-pocket costs. Medication costs—It's likely your share of the cost of cancer drugs will be high. So count on shelling out B-I-G bucks for chemotherapy plus other medicines to help relieve side effects. Transportation—Don't overlook gas and other expenses you may have when traveling to and from your treatment facility. And if you're seeking treatment outside of your home state, you'll have to foot the travel costs for tickets, lodging and food while you're away. Family and living expenses—You may incur costs related to running your household during your cancer treatment. These could include childcare or elder care expenses. Caregiving, at-home care, and long-term care—Cancer patients may require extensive assistance during treatment, such as fixing meals or transportation to medical appointments. Some patients even require long-term nursing care. Employment, legal, and financial issues—A cancer patient may incur costs for professional guidance to help address loss of wages for the patient or caregiver, to help sort out the tax implications of medical expenses, or to help write a will.     This is just a snapshot of some of the costs you may incur. But it should be more than enough to show that fighting cancer is truly a financial burden.     So is there any help available? Some resources to help ease your burden...     Of course, some of the most effective treatments are natural foods and supplements that don't cost very much at all. I firmly believe, based on the people we've interviewed during the last eight years, that patients can beat cancer on their own at home or by working with an alternative doctor on an outpatient basis.     Particularly for late-stage cancer patients, I believe the conventional treatments are almost worthless and you're better off with alternatives. Don't waste your last dollar on the chemo treatment that's supposed to give you two more months (it probably won't). Try the kinds of things Bill Henderson recommends in How to Cure Almost Any Cancer at Home for $5.15 or Day, or that Ty Bollinger recommends in The 31-Day Home Cancer Cure.     These are proven, validated cancer protocols that work for a lot of people. They don't work for 100 percent of patients — that's not realistic -- but I'm convinced they have a MUCH higher success rate for late-stage cancer than do conventional treatments.     But if you're an early-stage cancer patient you may decide to roll the dice on conventional treatments, or maybe you want to combine conventional and alternative therapies. Or perhaps you have a family member with cancer who won't consider alternatives.     In that case, you may need to brace yourself for a financial shock. In Issue #268, we covered a variety of resources that are available to people in the mainstream medical system and — sometimes — to patients undergoing alternative treatments. I suggest you take a look at that issue, and make sure you aren't missing any help that might available.     There are many non-profit organizations that provide assistance with medications, lodging, transportation, cleaning and other services for cancer patients.     And "Obamacare" -- the new federal law officially known as The Affordable Care Act -- is supposed to make healthcare more affordable and available to people diagnosed with cancer and other grave diseases. We'll see.     My wish is that the half million cancer patients diagnosed each year find the financial, emotional and medical support they need! Footnotes: 1Ramsey, S. et al. 2013. Washington state cancer patients found to be at greater risk for bankruptcy than people without a cancer diagnosis. Health Affairs. Published online before print May 2013, doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1263. Available at http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/32/6/1143 2National Cancer Institute. (2011, January 11). Cancer prevalence and cost of care projections. Retrieved from http://costprojections.cancer.gov/expenditures.html 3Duke Medicine News and Communications. 2011, June 6. Medical bills force cancer patients to skimp on care andnecessities.DukeHealth.org website. Available online at http://www.dukehealth.org/health_library/news/medical-bills-force-cancer-patients-to-skimp-on-care-and-necessities Addtional Resources: American Cancer Society. 2012. Health insurance and financial assistance for the cancer patient. Available at http://www.cancer.org/treatment/findingandpayingfortreatment/managinginsuranceissues/ healthinsuranceandfinancialassistanceforthecancerpatient/health-insurance-and- financial-assistance-options-for-uninsured American Cancer Society. 2011. The Affordable Care Act: How it helps people with cancer and their families. Available at http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@editorial/documents/document/acspc-026864.pdf Grens, K. 2011. Cancer costs highest for individually insured. Fox News. Available at http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2011/06/01/cancer-costs-highest-individually-insured/ Lacoma, T. 2013. The average cost of chemotherapy. Available on the eHow website at http://www.ehow.com/about_5591219_average-cost-chemotherapy.html National Cancer Institute. 2013. Coping with cancer: Financial, legal and insurance information. Available at http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/coping/financial-legal

Health Disclaimer: The information provided above is not intended as personal medical advice or instructions. You should not take any action affecting your health without consulting a qualified health professional. The authors and publishers of the information above are not doctors or health-caregivers. The authors and publishers believe the information to be accurate but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. There is some risk associated with ANY cancer treatment, and the reader should not act on the information above unless he or she is willing to assume the full risk.